If there was no collusion, what "justice" was there to obstruct?
That's not how it works, but you know that, and you and I know you've been trolling the last few posts you've made. "Your honor, you must drop the armed robbery charges since my client left the bank empty handed"
That's not how it works, but you know that, and you and I know you've been trolling the last few posts you've made. "Your honor, you must drop the armed robbery charges since my client left the bank empty handed"
You are being very cute there.
As an attorney you took criminal law.
You know the difference between attempted crimes and not having the mens rea because there was no crime underneath to obstruct.
In short if Trump knew he or his family did not do something illegal with Russia he could fire comey for any reason in the world including... to cause an end to the waste of resources and time investigation or just simply to stop the investigation into a non crime.
Even Rosenstein agreed per the memo that the fact there was no illegal collusion meant there was no obstruction of justice.
No justice was obstructed because there was no crime.