Jussie Smollett Charges Dropped To Protect Obama’s Involvement

e0ytmtztgho21.jpg
 
She merely recused herself from the case and withdrew all the support in her office from it. She effectively forced the "call".

The county's top prosecutor recused herself from the investigation last month
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/jussie-smollett-charges/index.html

Today's announcement that charges against actor Jussie Smollett were dropped comes more than a month after the county's top prosecutor recused herself from the investigation.

Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx recused herself "out of an abundance of caution," according to a spokeswoman from her office.

"Out of an abundance of caution, the decision to recuse herself was made to address potential questions of impartiality based upon familiarity with potential witnesses in the case," spokesperson Tandra Simonton said at the time.

The Cook County State's Attorney's Office didn't immediately explain why the 16 counts of felony disorderly conduct were dropped against Smollett today, except to say it came after reviewing the case's facts, and in view of Smollett's agreement to forfeit his $10,000 bond. Parts of the case will be sealed, one of Smollett's attorneys said.


From tmz





1:05 PM PT -- First Assistant to the Cook County State Attorney Joseph Magats -- who replaced Kim Foxx when she recused herself -- says they dropped the charges because Smollett doesn't have a violent criminal history, and lying about the alleged attack was not a violent crime.


Magats says his office prioritizes violent crimes in Chicago, and felt this case wouldn't be the best use of resources. For the record, he says he made this decision alone ... without consultation from Foxx.
 
From tmz





1:05 PM PT -- First Assistant to the Cook County State Attorney Joseph Magats -- who replaced Kim Foxx when she recused herself -- says they dropped the charges because Smollett doesn't have a violent criminal history, and lying about the alleged attack was not a violent crime.


Magats says his office prioritizes violent crimes in Chicago, and felt this case wouldn't be the best use of resources. For the record, he says he made this decision alone ... without consultation from Foxx.


Normally high profile cases are directly handled by the top District Attorney in the office. Only when the top DA desires to dodge their responsibilities for political reasons would they hand off a high profile case to a low level underlying.
 
Obama will live rent free in his little head until he dies , he's such a loser ,

I know. . . . . . but he's filthy rich.o_O.



Trump Suggests Obama Was Involved In Robert Mueller’s Investigation
The president’s claim echoes his earlier accusations of wiretapping.


President Donald Trump is suggesting that former President Barack Obama was involved in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump’s 2016 campaign.

He pushed a similar theory on Twitter in early 2017, accusing Obama of having his “wires tapped” in Trump Tower before the election. There was no evidence then, nor has any come to light since, yet Trump indicated to reporters Tuesday he still believes it’s true:

It’s a baffling talking point that high-ranking officials in his administration continue to repeat. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders did just that in an interview with CNN on Monday, blaming unnamed Democrats for being “behind the wiretapping.”

The accusation has repeatedly been rejected by other high-ranking officials, including Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats. A long NBC News report published Tuesday details how Coats, who was recruited for the job by Vice President Mike Pence, has repeatedly found himself frustrated by the president’s intransigence:

Twelve days before Coats was sworn in by Pence as DNI in March 2017, Trump accused Obama of wiretapping him during the 2016 campaign. “Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory,” he wrote on Twitter on March 4. Coats would find it was a subject Trump raised repeatedly. ...

Coats found it particularly hard to hide his exasperation with Trump’s insistence in the weeks after taking office that Obama had wiretapped him during the 2016 campaign, according to the officials. Over and over again Trump raised the issue, and over and over Coats told him he wasn’t wiretapped, officials said, but the president didn’t want to hear it.

“It was a recurring thing and began early on,” a senior administration official who observed the exchanges said. “You could tell that Coats thought the president was crazy.”

Then again, hard evidence has rarely ― if ever ― stopped Trump from clinging to blatant falsehoods.
 
Last edited:
If Trump can walk on obstruction, Smollett should walk on filing false police reports.

Trump didn't walk on obstruction. He was never charged with it. Also not a good comparison. It's whoever is behind the DA's decision to quash all charges that is obstructing justice in the Smollet case.
 
Trump didn't walk on obstruction. He was never charged with it. Also not a good comparison. It's whoever is behind the DA's decision to quash all charges that is obstructing justice in the Smollet case.

So is Barr obstructing justice for quashing obstruction charges instead of deferring to the House as the constitution says?
 
Back
Top