Just checking in. Still working on writing software and tweaking algorithms to get the strategy running. I've been writing a business plan of sorts and a bunch of little routines to help me quantify my trading system performance.
Believe me, the algorithm and the mathematical legwork is what takes the longest. I've spent hours and hours, but a lot of it has to do with really making sure the edge holds up statistically.
There was no -need- for this entry, but I want to point out that people don't just show up one day with magic trading algorithms and get rich. They have to put in a lot of sweat and sift through data, formulate an idea, test if the idea works, and build the framework to test the idea.
One aspect of this framework is components that can be re-used. Starting from scratch implies you have no components and no ideas to re-use or tweak. Starting from scratch is the hardest part.
Part of the insight I gain over time is the fact that many traders take an idea and just assume it will work. There was a panicky thread on ET today or yesterday where the guy lost 60% trying to trade support and resistance on the ES. See, that guy wasn't all that unlike me at one point -- he figured he could take a simple idea, run out, and make money with it. I've been at this game for years, failed, had to go work at the IB, and I've gone through the all the technical indicators, the basic ideas like S and R, and so on and so forth. The point is, an idea is just an idea. It really needs to be tested, and it has to be tested thoroughly. A person has to make the commitment to sit down and test cases, write their results, and continue.
I'm currently working on some "regime-switching" models that I picked up on from some of the books on time-series. I have a concept and some products I'm attempting to apply the trade to and the code in R is now pages upon pages. I have confidence some aspects of the strategy will work, but there are trial and error components to the strategy that are, at times, frustrating.
Believe me, the algorithm and the mathematical legwork is what takes the longest. I've spent hours and hours, but a lot of it has to do with really making sure the edge holds up statistically.
There was no -need- for this entry, but I want to point out that people don't just show up one day with magic trading algorithms and get rich. They have to put in a lot of sweat and sift through data, formulate an idea, test if the idea works, and build the framework to test the idea.
One aspect of this framework is components that can be re-used. Starting from scratch implies you have no components and no ideas to re-use or tweak. Starting from scratch is the hardest part.
Part of the insight I gain over time is the fact that many traders take an idea and just assume it will work. There was a panicky thread on ET today or yesterday where the guy lost 60% trying to trade support and resistance on the ES. See, that guy wasn't all that unlike me at one point -- he figured he could take a simple idea, run out, and make money with it. I've been at this game for years, failed, had to go work at the IB, and I've gone through the all the technical indicators, the basic ideas like S and R, and so on and so forth. The point is, an idea is just an idea. It really needs to be tested, and it has to be tested thoroughly. A person has to make the commitment to sit down and test cases, write their results, and continue.
I'm currently working on some "regime-switching" models that I picked up on from some of the books on time-series. I have a concept and some products I'm attempting to apply the trade to and the code in R is now pages upon pages. I have confidence some aspects of the strategy will work, but there are trial and error components to the strategy that are, at times, frustrating.