Jon Stewart vs Bill Oreilly on White Priviledge.
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Nail on the head.
Liberals continually inject race into every issue when it's irrelevant. Think of the millions of blacks WHO ARE successful. How did they become a success? Are those blacks guilty of "black privilege"?
This is the corner these morons paint themselves in, and it belies their racism towards whites. The narrative - only whites are successful, and oppress the black man. Except millions in every race ARE successful, including blacks. How can minorities, especially blacks, achieve success in this system that is so clearly oppressive, according to Liberals? They worked hard and valued education. So maybe that's the difference between the haves and the have nots? Work ethic and education. Not skin color.
It's that simple. Everyone knows it. But these Liberal losers want to create a business around victomology, for what? I get it at the political level - to create dependency, to engender Democratic Government that "solves" these faux problems. But at the grassroots level like Stewart who just repeat this claptrap? I don't get it. It's like mind control, confused thinking, bleeding heart socialism run amok.
I find it quite confusing to cogitate on. It doesn't make any sense. It's like trying to decipher the garbled ramblings of a baby. They go in one direction, then go in another. They adopt values, then exempt vast swaths of people from those values. Narratives are adopted, inconvenient facts are ignored.
Its almost as if they want to blame the shitty values that black people are handing to their kids on priviledge.
Instead of questioning the gangster culture that many blacks have in their communities they want to say that there is nothing wrong with the way that they are raising their children, and instead, middle class whites have some sort of priviledge for telling their kids to go to school, stay out of jail, and dont have kids out of wedlock.
Well guess what? Any person with a half a brain can see that those who go to school, dont go to jail, and dont have kids without a father do better than those who dont. Should we just say "Well thats their culture, they should be able to succeed even without following the rules, cause its not fair that their lifestyle repeatedly fails them?"
Its the bigotry of low expectations, and its exactly why blacks continue to fail, and continue to get worse. Instead of trying to change the destructive behaviour liberals would rather coddle them and tell them that the shitty way they live their lives should still warrant the same kind of success that those who dont live like that enjoy.
Instead of questioning the gangster culture that many blacks have in their communities they want to say that there is nothing wrong with the way that they are raising their children, and instead, middle class whites have some sort of priviledge for telling their kids to go to school, stay out of jail, and dont have kids out of wedlock.
Well guess what? Any person with a half a brain can see that those who go to school, dont go to jail, and dont have kids without a father do better than those who dont. Should we just say "Well thats their culture, they should be able to succeed even without following the rules, cause its not fair that their lifestyle repeatedly fails them?"
Its the bigotry of low expectations, and its exactly why blacks continue to fail, and continue to get worse. Instead of trying to change the destructive behaviour liberals would rather coddle them and tell them that the shitty way they live their lives should still warrant the same kind of success that those who dont live like that enjoy.
Exactly. Well said.
Low info liberals get their "news" from Stewart.
Good post. Having been around these kids for years at schools there are 2 family types basically ... (1) where the parent(s) work hard, typically at low paying jobs .. the true working poor, but they try and aspire for better for their kids. Sadly, 3/4 of the time it's just Mom as the father is MIA. (2) the other type is the thug or a person who expects someone else to pay their bills (welfare), given them a place to live (Section 8 housing), food (EBIT/SNAP), free phones for the parent and kids. Certainly not a role model to the kids they have. Typically doesn't help the kid with school work.
And you can see the behavioral difference most of the time between the kids who come from these 2 types of families ... the latter type much more dysfunctional, rowdy and unmotivated as far as learning. They see school as a 'bore'. The others you hope will overcome their current situation and do something with their lives.
If ANYONE, These are the people we are failing, and while they represent a small minority, i would have no problem if the system gave more money to middle aged people who exhibited exemplary job performance who could actually show that they have no way to better themselves, but they desired a way out. Let colleges fast track them too, but they must exhibit a genuine desire, they must already be hard workers, and they must meet academic standards.
I agree with that.
it's a post like this that makes me worried you may actually know something about climate change.