Jon Stewart Rips Fox a Brand New One

Lends more weight to Ailes' theory that he's quitting because he had hoped to make a dent, but never had.
You don't read all that well. I didn't give my opinion, just quoted what Ailes said, and coupled with the fact that Stewart didn't need the money, pointed out that played into Ailes' comments. That's all.
WTF? "Lends more weight?"

I had quoted Arnie in that post I deleted, but evidently not before you quoted me. Stewart is in demand. He's done it for 17 years. 17! They're still throwing money at him because it makes good business sense to do so. You ever wonder why that might be? And you think he's leaving in resignation with slumped shoulders because he didn't make a dent? I agree one of us doesn't read that well.
 
Last edited:
It was the Right Wing media that went crazy over his "secret meetings with Obama." Tell them.

How telling that Obama has to call a comedian who has a fake news show on comedy central to the White House to coordinate content. You sat there for the last 7 years and willingly absorbed all that propaganda and never questioned a single thing. How obedient of you!
 
WTF? "Lends more weight?"

I had quoted Arnie in that post I deleted, but evidently not before you quoted me. Stewart is in demand. He's done it for 17 years. 17! They're still throwing money at him because it makes good business sense to do so. You ever wonder why that might be? And you think he's leaving in resignation with slumped shoulders because he didn't make a dent? I agree one of us doesn't read that well.

Ah, my bad. Hard for me to track all the posts and deletions, and who they're replying to before they're replying to someone else.

Again, I didn't say I thought that he was leaving because he didn't make a dent.

Perhaps a coloring book might help? One with the little numbers that identifies which colors should go into which shapes?
 
Ah, my bad. Hard for me to track all the posts and deletions, and who they're replying to before they're replying to someone else.

Again, I didn't say I thought that he was leaving because he didn't make a dent.

Perhaps a coloring book might help? One with the little numbers that identifies which colors should go into which shapes?
no, he's leaving because his old dying party is running out of money and it's no longer entertaining to make fun of republicans when the democrats you know and love are just as bad if not worse.
 
no, he's leaving because his old dying party is running out of money and it's no longer entertaining to make fun of republicans when the democrats you know and love are just as bad if not worse.
Or maybe he just wants to do something else? Naw, too simple!
 
LOL

Wow, I thought sure he would get into politics, 'cus, you know, he is just so smart!!

Everyone is wondering what the funny man's next step will be!

Well, he finally revealed the answer on the Employee Of The Month podcast. He said:

"I've got maybe four or five more years with the kids before they really don't want anything to do with me. I'm just not there … But believe me, I feel like I'm going to work even more, I'll just be able to do it more near to them … I'd love to do more stand-up."

"You can only go so far with four facial expressions and five-to-seven curse words. There are so many iterations of that, that you can do, before people just go hmm. I would love to see the next iteration of that."

end!
 
Bill O'Reilly Had A Terrible 2015


Bill O'Reilly's Credibility Crumbled Even More In 2015

Fox News host Bill O'Reilly lost what little journalistic credibility he still had in 2015 as journalists, colleagues, and media observers dismantled many of the fabrications he told about his journalism career and in his books. Media Matters looks back at O'Reilly's horrible year.

Numerous Journalists Took Apart O'Reilly's Falklands War Tales. O'Reilly has repeatedly attempted to bolster his reporting credentials by claiming over the years that he reported "in the Falklands" during the 1982 Falklands War. A Mother Jones exposé, however, found that O'Reilly fabricated his reporting resume and his former colleagues said he was actually 1,200 miles away in Buenos Aires. O'Reilly also claimed to have reported on a 1982 Buenos Aires protest in which "many were killed," but numerous journalists who reported from the scene and a historian disputed his story. Furthermore, O'Reilly claimed to have helped an injured CBS photographer during the protest, but his colleagues have no recollection of that incident. [Mother Jones, 2/19/15; Media Matters, 2/24/15]

O'Reilly's Incredible Tale About A Kennedy Assassination Figure Imploded. O'Reilly claimed on Fox News and in his book Killing Kennedy that he was outside the Florida house where Lee Harvey Oswald friend George de Mohrenschildt was staying when he killed himself in 1977. Though O'Reilly claimed to have heard the fatal gunshot, his tale unraveled when numerous pieces of evidence emerged contradicting his claim. The evidence includes an audio tape of O'Reilly saying he's "coming to Florida" after being informed of the suicide; colleagues who contradicted and were unable to corroborate his story; and a police report that makes no mention of O'Reilly and provides details that cast doubt on his tale. [Media Matters, 3/11/15]

O'Reilly Fabrication: He "Saw Nuns Get Shot In The Back Of The Head" In El Salvador. While discussing his time covering the civil war in El Salvador in the early 1980s, O'Reilly claimed he "was in El Salvador and I saw nuns get shot in the back of the head." In reality, the incident took place months before he arrived in the country. O'Reilly attempted damage control by claiming that when he said he "saw nuns get shot," he was referring to seeing "horrendous images" of nuns murdered while reporting from El Salvador, not witnessing those murders firsthand. [Media Matters, 2/25/15]

O'Reilly's Northern Ireland Bombing Lie: He's "Seen ... Irish Terrorists Kill And Maim Their Fellow Citizens In Belfast With Bombs." O'Reilly claimed in his book Keep it Pithy that he's "seen soldiers gun down unarmed civilians in Latin America, Irish terrorists kill and maim their fellow citizens in Belfast with bombs." A Fox News spokesperson later "said that O'Reilly was not an eyewitness to any bombings or injuries in Northern Ireland. Instead, he was shown photos of bombings by Protestant police officers." [Media Matters, 3/3/15]

Colleagues Disputed O'Reilly's Tale Of Danger During The Los Angeles Riots. O'Reilly claimed of his reporting for Inside Edition during the Los Angeles riots: "We were attacked, we were attacked by protesters, where bricks were thrown at us." However, the Guardian reported that six of O'Reilly's colleagues "have disputed his account of surviving a bombardment of bricks and rocks while covering the 1992 riots in Los Angeles." [The Guardian, 2/26/15; Media Matters, 2/26/15]

Republicans Accused O'Reilly Of Factual Inaccuracies In Killing ReaganBook. Numerous Republicans challenged O'Reilly over factual inaccuracies in his book Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency. The critics included former Reagan aides and Reagan biographers, who called O'Reilly's book "garbage" and "a disservice to history." One of O'Reilly's biggest critics has been conservative columnist and Fox News contributor George Will, who called O'Reilly "an opportunistic interloper" whose "vast carelessness pollutes history and debases the historian's craft."
 
The mainstream media, as universally defined, is far more impartial than its critics. I'm not suggesting Stewart is exactly mainstream, but he's far more fair and balanced than Fox and Breitbart and all the other bad haircuts ever were. They don't even try.

Sometimes you are really funny, although unintentionally.:D
 
Back
Top