Quote from carl1111:
so you still consider gs to be the better offer? Also, the trading firm is a market-taking firm. Also, they trade based on volatility caused by news and earnings releases.
Quote from tomcole:
From the tone and what he has said, I highly doubt carl has any job offers from any tier 1 firms, nor did he graduate a "pedigree" school in Chi-town in 3 years. Nor did he intern at GS.
He simply lacks the understanding / knowledge that someone who interned would have. Also, how smart is a kid who says he graduated in 3 years from a high-end school, which would have tremendously deep career counseling staff, and instead of seeking their thoughts on this, he starts asking on this website if GS is worthy of his time and efforts?
FWIW, last years recruits from quant schools at GS are making all-in substantially more than any numbers posted so far on this thread.
Quote from rufus_4000:
I was on the recruiting committee for a tier-one investment bank for new MBA graduates. I was doing analytics, so I was looking for quantitatively inclined. But I was surprised to flip through the final result to find out that the new ibanking associate for 2002 class consists of 13 accepted offers (very very small considering that the '05 class is probably 60-70), 10 from HBS, 1 from Stanford, 1 from Sloan, and 1 from Columbia, that's it, no Wharton, no B-school ranked below them (Tuck, Hass, etc). Of course this is during the bottom of recession in 2002, but who can guarantee that we won't have any economic downturn a couple of years from now?
Quote from Copernicus:
wharton is the most overrated school in the universe, especially when it comes to finance. check the finance elective list at Wharton and compare to Columbia and NYU, Wharton looks like a community college.