Quote from carl1111:
Deringer- that is my first instinct as well, but both trading and banking have become commodities in many ways. If I do trading and succeed, I could earn what a VP in banking earns by my fourth year in trading. If I am not good at trading I will still have time to study for my GMAT, get my CFA, and then hopefully get in to a good business school from which I could hopefully join an investment banking again but as an associate. Thus it makes the decision more murky.
Let me generalize, there are clearly some diverse opinion here, but keep in mind that you are asking a bunch of traders, so our perception of the investment banking world is indirect. I doubt there are very many ex-ibankers reading this forum. My only association with ibanking was that my partner at a hedge fund was head of tech banking for Solly, and I have never actually worked on a deal.
If you are hesitating, and it seems you are, take the GS offer. It is that simple. Your undergrad degree in b-school would be better suited for i-banking anyways. But the failure rate at GS/MS ibanking is as high as a trading trainee. Go to NY scene, and there are plenty of failed GS/MS ibanking associates walking around, similar to trading, very few would make it to VP and above.
And in my opinion, there are very few firms that would be comparable to DRW, Susquehanna that some one mentioned, Hull, maybe Wolverine and Peak6, and maybe Timber Hill. I talked to Trent Cutler a couple of times, and I am not that impressed. Ronin is decent, but still only been around a few years.
Good luck.