There's nothing like having a brain damaged person leading the country.
Joe Biden - The Fake President
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
There's nothing like having a brain damaged person leading the country.
Even Bloomberg has figured it out.
Biden Covid Team Derides Trump Plan While Borrowing Playbook
President Joe Biden and his top advisers have derided the Trump administration’s playbook for distributing coronavirus vaccines, but so far have made only modest changes to the plan that’s meeting their target pace of more than one million shots a day.
More at.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...an-while-borrowing-its-playbook?sref=ZMFHsM5Z
Biden Covid Team Derides Trump Plan While Borrowing Playbook
President Joe Biden and his top advisers have derided the Trump administration’s playbook for distributing coronavirus vaccines, but so far have made only modest changes to the plan that’s meeting their target pace of more than one million shots a day.
More at.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...an-while-borrowing-its-playbook?sref=ZMFHsM5Z
Biden has no choice besides copying everything Trump did.
Because if he doesn't, then he would be doing something stupid.
The below article illustrates what I have been saying for years. If climate change is really a problem, the only solution is a new technology. It is absolutely impossible to use existing technology to end the use of fossil fuels. A political solution of taxes is unequivocally completely retarded and will not solve any problems. It will just cause major economic problems.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...dens-green-new-deal-is-an-impossible-cluster/
Delingpole: Biden’s Green New Deal Is an ‘Impossible Cluster****’
To summarize: to get the world to zero emissions by 2050, our options are to build, commission, and bring on-line either:
• One 2.1 gigawatt (GW, 109 watts) nuclear power plant each and every day until 2050, OR
• 3,000 two-megawatt (MW, 106 watts) wind turbines each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming there’s not one turbine failure for any reason, OR
• 96 square miles (250 square kilometres) of solar panels each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming not one of the panels fails or is destroyed by hail or wind.
People generally have little idea just how much energy we get from fossil fuels. Figure 1 shows the global annual total and fossil energy consumption from 1880 to 2019, and extensions of both trends to the year 2050. I note that my rough estimate of 2050 total annual energy consumption (241 petawatt-hrs/year) is quite close to the World Energy Council’s business-as-usual 2050 estimate of 244 PWhr/yr.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...dens-green-new-deal-is-an-impossible-cluster/
Delingpole: Biden’s Green New Deal Is an ‘Impossible Cluster****’
To summarize: to get the world to zero emissions by 2050, our options are to build, commission, and bring on-line either:
• One 2.1 gigawatt (GW, 109 watts) nuclear power plant each and every day until 2050, OR
• 3,000 two-megawatt (MW, 106 watts) wind turbines each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming there’s not one turbine failure for any reason, OR
• 96 square miles (250 square kilometres) of solar panels each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming not one of the panels fails or is destroyed by hail or wind.
People generally have little idea just how much energy we get from fossil fuels. Figure 1 shows the global annual total and fossil energy consumption from 1880 to 2019, and extensions of both trends to the year 2050. I note that my rough estimate of 2050 total annual energy consumption (241 petawatt-hrs/year) is quite close to the World Energy Council’s business-as-usual 2050 estimate of 244 PWhr/yr.
Last edited:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...dens-green-new-deal-is-an-impossible-cluster/
Delingpole: Biden’s Green New Deal Is an ‘Impossible Cluster****’
To summarize: to get the world to zero emissions by 2050, our options are to build, commission, and bring on-line either:
• One 2.1 gigawatt (GW, 109 watts) nuclear power plant each and every day until 2050, OR
• 3,000 two-megawatt (MW, 106 watts) wind turbines each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming there’s not one turbine failure for any reason, OR
• 96 square miles (250 square kilometres) of solar panels each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming not one of the panels fails or is destroyed by hail or wind.
People generally have little idea just how much energy we get from fossil fuels. Figure 1 shows the global annual total and fossil energy consumption from 1880 to 2019, and extensions of both trends to the year 2050. I note that my rough estimate of 2050 total annual energy consumption (241 petawatt-hrs/year) is quite close to the World Energy Council’s business-as-usual 2050 estimate of 244 PWhr/yr.
And this does not even account for the extra electric energy that would be needed to power all the electric vehicles that Biden wants to add to the roads via his policies -- replacing gas vehicles.
UK leads US rollout.
COVID would be all but eradicated if we had experienced four years of competence. Instead we had "Operation Warp Speed" which resulted in a rollout of 10% of the promised doses. That Perna is dyslexic or illiterate. Complete failure from top to bottom... but what else would you expect when you build a house on mud?
COVID would be all but eradicated if we had experienced four years of competence. Instead we had "Operation Warp Speed" which resulted in a rollout of 10% of the promised doses. That Perna is dyslexic or illiterate. Complete failure from top to bottom... but what else would you expect when you build a house on mud?
The below article illustrates what I have been saying for years. If climate change is really a problem, the only solution is a new technology. It is absolutely impossible to use existing technology to end the use of fossil fuels. A political solution of taxes is unequivocally completely retarded and will not solve any problems. It will just cause major economic problems.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...dens-green-new-deal-is-an-impossible-cluster/
Delingpole: Biden’s Green New Deal Is an ‘Impossible Cluster****’
To summarize: to get the world to zero emissions by 2050, our options are to build, commission, and bring on-line either:
• One 2.1 gigawatt (GW, 109 watts) nuclear power plant each and every day until 2050, OR
• 3,000 two-megawatt (MW, 106 watts) wind turbines each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming there’s not one turbine failure for any reason, OR
• 96 square miles (250 square kilometres) of solar panels each and every day until 2050 plus a 2.1 GW nuclear power plant every day and a half until 2050, assuming not one of the panels fails or is destroyed by hail or wind.
People generally have little idea just how much energy we get from fossil fuels. Figure 1 shows the global annual total and fossil energy consumption from 1880 to 2019, and extensions of both trends to the year 2050. I note that my rough estimate of 2050 total annual energy consumption (241 petawatt-hrs/year) is quite close to the World Energy Council’s business-as-usual 2050 estimate of 244 PWhr/yr.
What you posted is an opinion piece, not a news article. You right wingers need to learn the difference.
Oh, is that how you dismiss reality?