Jim Acucksta gets owned again

Slartibartfast said:
Oh and Max, my Jedi skills are good but if this was constructed in hindsight months after to upset Poindexter..
More...


You should really just become a nigerian prince and start phoning people to sell you their info....... that story would be more believable. :D
 
Frederick Foresight said:
Yeah, but on the plus side, that outfit on her is far more slimming than what she usually wears at press briefings. I think maybe that's why the Captain posted it. :D

What, no cardio bunnies at the gym today, Cap'n? :D
More...
As a matter of fact there were. Some days it's more of a challenge to concentrate. Look, don't look, oh shit she's doing deadlifts. :p
 
Max E. said:
Yeah of course im going on and on about that, i was one of the top 5 traders out of 2000 when i worked in a propfirm, and my win percent was low 60's so you would have to be god to place 200 trades in a day and be 90% on both sides, its incredibly obvious to anyone whose been in the industry.

You could make a 90% win rate, but it would require averaging down in which case your losers would be 10 times bigger than the winners. This would not be possible though if your placing 200 trades in a day and winning on both sides of the equation, no one who understands the market would believe your blotter.
More...

I think the problem here is you are creating a straw man as you know that was a swing rather than normal tick scalping.. but also you worked at propfirms that lets face it.. hired you..

I thought I was pretty hot shit until my broker told me about quite a few clients who were way way better than me. *WAY WAY better.

Now.. look again at that few days. I'm not going to groundhog day this as I'd already explained it before to pointy how one order can become multiple. I showed him an example of a single 10 car (I think) trade becoming two or three 'trades'. This is just what occurs with larger orders. I did not make the reporting in NT. I additionally have an adaptive method to break large (20s etc) into smaller chunks to avoid bots sniffing icebergs (or ice cubes :) ) when volume is lower.

Also, speaking of groundhog day and Poin's dishonesty. He pasted some quotes of him asking for statements. There was a lot more in that thread. I explained that I have multiple brokers which the report was consolidating. I told him to first tell me what he would accept as reasonable for me to redact before posting on a public forum.


*Hint, they did not need to work for a poxy prop firm.
 
Last edited:
CaptainObvious said:
As a matter of fact there were. Some days it's more of a challenge to concentrate. Look, don't look, oh shit she's doing deadlifts. :p
More...
Yeah, I know. You want to look but not be creepy about it. Tough balancing act. Here's a rule of thumb that's fairly specific but has some general application:

upload_2018-8-3_14-5-38.png


Good luck trying to get away with sunglasses at the gym, though.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
Yeah, I know. You want to look but not be creepy about it. Tough balancing act. Here's a rule of thumb that's fairly specific but has some general application:

View attachment 189428

Good luck trying to get away with sunglasses at the gym, though.
More...
It's tough to not be a dirty old man. I'm old, I'm dirty, but not dead yet. Had a friend tell me it's not perving if you look less than 5 minutes, or was that 5 seconds? Bottom line, when I don't care to glance a second at a pretty girl, it's probably time to go out on the ice flow and let the wolves have me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top