Very well, if you say so...I'm not an expert at all things Japanese. But it is plainly visible that there was no "steamroller" about to crush the Japanese economy. It was continuing it's descent into nothing-ness when lunacy about Abenomics was brought forth. It's more an example of Abe being fed up with the results than worried about imminent demise.
So instead of trying a new approach, he "doubled down" or tripled if you will. That was the "radical" approach.
It's all the same skull... Moreover, I don't "try to cite people". I am citing Richard Koo, who is relatively well-known and is recognised pretty universally as somewhat of an expert on the Japanese experience. If you can find other people/sources who can offer a similarly insightful analysis of Japan, I would love to see those, rather than a discussion about coffee. As to 99% of the finance community agreeing on something, pls don't make me laugh. That's pretty weak sauce...The only try and failed you mention is the fiscal and monetary easing Japan has undertaken and which utterly failed. So, now you pull the next skull out of the closet and try to cite people who claim to have evidence that Japan would be in much worse shape without the trillions of yen in fiscal and monetary stimulus over the past 20 years? Lol, I am sure I can find a highly respected researcher who claims that coffee is the all-round weapon against any sorts of cancer. Mate, I think we can agree that 99% of the finance community at large agrees that fiscal and monetary stimulus has NOT worked for Japan.
How can we move on to a meaningful discourse if we already disagree on basic facts?
Finally, instead of disagreeing about facts or whatever, why don't you respond to my question(s) and we can then proceed from there?