Quote from makosgu:
Having look at both Grob and Prof stuff in detail (ie. flowcharts of both), it was interesting to note that both were forms of SCT (the end of a trading opportunity is also the beginning of the next trading opportunity).
One can look at Proflogic/Charlie Dow's stuff/post. His too is SCT and 100% objective across the 4 fractals he rides. I have looked at both completely and understand the single overlap which is the FTT!
Both use two fractals CONCURRENTLY to trade the slower fractal. It is absolutely astonishing how both started along two different paths and wound up realizing a framework that takes CAPITAL out of the market CONTINUAL and SEAMLESSLY (ie fist over hand). Both will tell you that the screw up is the trader, not the framework (ie. EQ). They have both done the IQ. Similarly, both individuals get the same amount of flack for something that they had both developed completely themselves...
Admittedly, both are passionate about what they do. I have seen the FULL BLOWN schematic of both. Prof has gone as so far as to create a complete textbook that has been revised several times over for ITERATIVE IMPROVEMENTS! How can this be that two differing paths wound up with the realization that the trading market, by definition, will always be a SEAMLESS and CONTINUOUS stream of money???!!!
Go the Prof route if you need to simplify to a single tool and total PROGRAMMABLE objectivity. Both are in fact objective. One just requires a bit more fine tuning but also rewards for fine tuning...
MAK!
Good post MAK......