It's Official: Democrats are Unstoppable

[gaussian]

Wow..... I cannot even comment on how ignorant this is. It is not up to the victims to build the case or did you fail civics class in that short yellow bus school you went to haha..

The prosecutor fucked up which caused the entire case to be thrown out. This has nothing to do with Pelosi.... do you go to bed and fantasize abotu Pelosi every night?

Seems you were encouraging getting rid of due process so that we can continue believing all women.

Unfortunately for you it is the responsibility of the accuser (or their representatives) to present sufficient, legally obtained, and valid evidence to convict someone of a crime. In fact, self incrimination is protected by the 5th amendment. It’s called habeus corpus El Civics Expert. It’s required.

I’m not sure how I’m the one that’s ignorant when Cosby’s rights were deprived under color of law, and somehow we still believe the evidence anyway?

I hope all that virtue signaling gets you laid because it certainly doesn’t make you look aware of how a court proceeding actually works. DA violates Cosby’s rights, case is thrown out due to corruption of evidence. The logical implication is that ANY or ALL of the evidence was fraudulently obtained. Therefore don’t pass go, don’t collect $200, and certainly don’t fuck up your job so bad a guy you locked up gets out.

 

[Cuddles]

Seems you were encouraging getting rid of due process so that we can continue believing all women.

Unfortunately for you it is the responsibility of the accuser (or their representatives) to present sufficient, legally obtained, and valid evidence to convict someone of a crime. In fact, self incrimination is protected by the 5th amendment. It’s called habeus corpus El Civics Expert. It’s required.

Ocho said not the responsibility of the victim, so nice attempt at a rewrite and expecting someone not to call out your bullshit on somehow the vic becoming the accuser becoming the prosecutor. No one's apologizing for the prosecution fucking up. We're all just laughing at y'all trying to make this some sort of "dem" issue.

 

[El OchoCinco]

The media and various groups are howling at the injustice of it all, but ya know, realistically. the women got a fantastic outcome. Yeh, I get the bit about how it does not undo the sexual assaults and all of that, and that is valid, but just in regard to what they were able to squeeze out of the justice system through various contorted moves and luck.

The first prosecutor concluded that he/she could not get a conviction so he (rather unethically or controversially) gave Cosby immunity so that the women could compel testimony on them in their civil suits, which they did and they got big settlements.

The second prosecutor still goes ahead and prosecutes him anyway and - and although it was reversed- he ended out doing time anyway. He got 3-10 years and he did 2 years but probably would have been let out about 4 years anyway do to age, medical conditions imagined and real, whatever.

The women got both civil settlements, and to see him do time and reputational damage. Not a bad outcome for them, really, given the very real possibility that he could have skated totally. The first prosecutor could have gone to trial, and if he remained silent they would not have had the testimony from the civil suit that they used to convict him. Very messy, but it did not all work against them, not by a longshot.

Methinks.

If the prosecutor fucked up then the decision of the higher court is correct even if not fair. We all know of cases where the murder weapon tying the person to the crime was thrown out because of illegal search even though it is clear the person did it. This is supposed to happen to make sure prosecutors follow the law and are held to a high standard (wish police were held to the same standard).

 

[El OchoCinco]

Seems you were encouraging getting rid of due process so that we can continue believing all women.

Unfortunately for you it is the responsibility of the accuser (or their representatives) to present sufficient, legally obtained, and valid evidence to convict someone of a crime. In fact, self incrimination is protected by the 5th amendment. It’s called habeus corpus El Civics Expert. It’s required.

I’m not sure how I’m the one that’s ignorant when Cosby’s rights were deprived under color of law, and somehow we still believe the evidence anyway?

I hope all that virtue signaling gets you laid because it certainly doesn’t make you look aware of how a court proceeding actually works. DA violates Cosby’s rights, case is thrown out due to corruption of evidence. The logical implication is that ANY or ALL of the evidence was fraudulently obtained. Therefore don’t pass go, don’t collect $200, and certainly don’t fuck up your job so bad a guy you locked up gets out.

Wow.... this is too stupid to even answer.

Go back and tell me where I said anything you are claiming I said dumbass. Has nothing to do with believe the woman or some Democratic bullshit.

A prosecutor fucked up and the SC reached the right decision. Anything else you said is ignorant diarrhea.

 

[Overnight]

If the prosecutor fucked up then the decision of the higher court is correct even if not fair. We all know of cases where the murder weapon tying the person to the crime was thrown out because of illegal search even though it is clear the person did it. This is supposed to happen to make sure prosecutors follow the law and are held to a high standard (wish police were held to the same standard).

If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit?

 

[El OchoCinco]

If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit?

Well that was stupid for a whole host of other reasons haha

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

If the prosecutor fucked up then the decision of the higher court is correct even if not fair. We all know of cases where the murder weapon tying the person to the crime was thrown out because of illegal search even though it is clear the person did it. This is supposed to happen to make sure prosecutors follow the law and are held to a high standard (wish police were held to the same standard).

Both prosecutors fucked up. The first and the second. The first fucked up by offering immunity in order to pave the way for the defendant to be financially punished civilly when he knew he could not get a conviction, or did not think he could. That is an abuse of his power and position. The second prosecutor fucked just by trying to revive the case ten to twelve years later to meet some woke goals, and with knowledge that the first prosecutor had extended immunity. They all clowned around. Both prosecutors and the trial judge and the Supreme Court had to de-clown it.

This was not really a rocket science issue, nor was there a question of fact as to whether the prosecutor intended to offer full immunity. The defense got lucky and the previous prosecutor flat out stated that he did. Then it descended into whether the deal had or had not been perfected because it was not in writing. womp..womp.

Although it is probably the last thing anyone wants to hear, similar issues will arise under the Maxwell/Epstein case. Even though Epstein and Maxwell are both guilty scumbags like Cosby, the South District of New York brought charges against Epstein and by extension to Maxwell on facts that were clearly part of that Florida case where Epstein got immunity for both himself and his associates and contacts including Maxwell in return for agreeing to plead guilty on the florida state charges.

Now the government claims that any plea deal offered there was only binding in the u.s. florida prosecutorial district and not binding on anything that happened in new york or elsewhere. Nope. That is not going to fly.

 

[gaussian]

Both prosecutors fucked up. The first and the second. The first fucked up by offering immunity in order to pave the way for the defendant to be financially punished civilly when he knew he could not get a conviction

The fact this even exists is sickening. "Hey look it doesn't appear there's enough evidence you were actually assaulted so we'll try to extract as much money from a rich person as we can".

#FundAllWomen

Ocho said not the responsibility of the victim, so nice attempt at a rewrite and expecting someone not to call out your bullshit on somehow the vic becoming the accuser becoming the prosecutor. No one's apologizing for the prosecution fucking up. We're all just laughing at y'all trying to make this some sort of "dem" issue.

If it's not the responsibility of the victim to not lie and manipulate the prosecution into taking your case then who's is it? Prosecutors are politicians. They took the case to make their careers on everyone's favorite prime time TV show star.

Oh, right, the alleged victim's lawyer's.


My dovetail into the dem thing was because #BelieveAllWomen is supported heavily by the left despite the evidence being almost insurmountable a large portion of these cases are fraudulent. There are men in prison right now for nothing more than a pretty girl crying in front of a jury. It seems that in these cases everyone, and especially the woke left, are more than willing to throw out due process (re: Kavanaugh and several high profile college athlete accusations) in favor of throwing the guy in prison.

If you haven't been reading the news lately the opinion is this is all definitely because of Republican lawyers, Trump, and toxic white males. It is absolutely political, and you can blame your people for it.