Its impossible to be profitable in trading as a retail trader

Very hot discussion, just as reader might get some valuiable motivation, because still can't making profit consistently as retail trader, I am only trade forex with little capital and still hard to making profit. maybe impossible being profitable for long run
 
Very hot discussion, just as reader might get some valuiable motivation, because still can't making profit consistently as retail trader, I am only trade forex with little capital and still hard to making profit. maybe impossible being profitable for long run
Not impossible, difficult yes and often takes years to develop into consistent profitability. Most want to rush it and lose early unnecessarily. Dues will be paid in any event.
 
Not impossible, difficult yes and often takes years to develop into consistent profitability. Most want to rush it and lose early unnecessarily. Dues will be paid in any event.
Need intention eventually, maybe required long years as long as still treat as business, but yes still difrficult to making profit consistently, rush in trading is like as disease retail trader which want making quick profit
 
I read somewhere that trading books have caused possibly the largest wealth transfer in history. Boy, were they right. I have self taught myself technical analysis, fundamental analysis and price action. I have read hundreds of books on the subject. And over the years of trading NONE of them have been even close to profitable. Their only edge is that they just happen to time their trades in either strong bull or bear markets.

Believe me I have backtested countless strategies from candlesticks to MACDs to price action to FX correlations to Presidential Elections to Order book correlations to even solar and lunar cycles at one point. And guess what. None of them give you any kind of edge whatsoever because that information is already public and whoever disclosed it in the first place is probably rich by now with his or her book sales.

correlations that occur are only temporary. Quants and Hedge funds try to scalp this inefficiency. But even then, this can never be a consistently profitable strategy as competition increases to try to capitalize on this inefficiency. Eventually, this inefficiency is simply evaporated. And oh look: Hedge funds are dropping like flies if you read the news now because of so much competition. The market can stay irrational for longer than you can stay liquid. And those who can stay liquid already have a ton of capital to win through sheer trial and error alone. Thats why 99% of retail traders consistently fail. They just don’t have the capital to win through trial and error.

As a closing statement, I would like to reveal a little secret. If you buy today and sell tomorrow, you have a 50/50 chance it will either go up or down. This is true for virtually every stock, index or forex out there. Go ahead and backtest it yourself if you want. (Boy, are those 1% of profitable traders laughing their guts out right now!)

Now that I look back, if I just followed the buy and hold strategy with most of my trades I would have been a millionaire within 5 years.

What you are missing is more important and this part is not even mentioned.

Despite all the snake oil of price action , trends , trend trading and technical analyses , the proof of the success is 95 % of all traders lose .

https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=95 % of all traders lose

many traders suffer delusions in processing information about a trade

Even if a trader was given a profitable system , method or education on price action , technical analysis or trend trading , most traders would fail because of their psyche .This is what the trading industry does not want you to know , their marketing charlatans still keep promoting technical junk science as the key to success , that is only 20 % of the equation .Little knowledge is dangerous.
 
Last edited:
I have quite a few clients who are successfully (profitable) trading futures spreads on a retail account basis. So, yes, it is possible of course. Having said that, we have a highly refined trading system that is and has been an ongoing evolution since the early 1990's. And it has changed over time - namely; a movement towards a streamlined trade entry confirmation protocol, lower volatility products and longer holding time frames would be the most prominent features.

So, possible - yes. Requires a refined and well-tuned trading system - yes.
 
I have quite a few clients who are successfully (profitable) trading futures spreads on a retail account basis. So, yes, it is possible of course. Having said that, we have a highly refined trading system that is and has been an ongoing evolution since the early 1990's. And it has changed over time - namely; a movement towards a streamlined trade entry confirmation protocol, lower volatility products and longer holding time frames would be the most prominent features.

So, possible - yes. Requires a refined and well-tuned trading system - yes.

The main problem I see with trading is the mental aspect of it , this is where traders mostly fail.

The solution is set and forget strategies , these eliminate most phsyche issues of traders.If you have mastered , set and forget strategies , option /futures spreads offer the the only hope.
 
The main problem I see with trading is the mental aspect of it , this is where traders mostly fail.

Well, from my experience there is more than a little truth to that. And by mental, I see it as potential clients who come to me with emotional pain caused by excessive and misplaced risk as well as the resultant destroyed confidence.

But, getting thoroughly schooled on a good trading system, and then paper trading the system with a large degree of accountability can build that confidence back if the client is willing to put in the work and make the commitment. I am also rather harsh at strategic times with clients who bullshit themselves and bullshit me.

You also make a fair point about the products traded. It would be asinine for any person to equate certainty with trading. Furthermore, > 90 % of the positions a trader enters are going to be underwater for some portion of that trade's lifespan (especially since we are swing trading). Intramarket futures spreads especially are good for moderating anxiety in terms of a very modest trading range and volatility. And once a trader gets his confidence in stride as well as a positive account equity balance, then those same spreads have such a thick bid/ask volume that scaling up is not a problem.

That's the way I see it. YMMV.
 
In terms of my own clients, they need to build up their self-assurance by appreciating their own ability and their own results. And that takes time and commitment. The clients that I see do well with my system in the live markets are the clients willing to paper trade under my close tutelage for 12 months - and to meet with me one-on-one in order to discuss each and every trade entry and the placement of each profit target and stop-loss level. Over time, mistakes are greatly reduced or eliminated, and the client becomes more proficient at spread construction and sexy trade entry identification. Then there comes a point in time where the client says "fuck it I can't take it any longer" and he opens an account and he starts trading for real.
 
Ever since 2011, there been decline in volume with exception of long down bars. After the first 90 minutes, volume does not even pick much in afternoon.

View attachment 164209

LOL, if you going to talk about history, how about being right, one million contracts is nothing considering ES is a very watered down version S&P500 futures contract of old, I have to trade ten times more to get same bang for the buck when S&P500 was $500 a point. CME made ES to sucker in more chumps who are under capitalized to pay exchange fees and give it's members more money. Thirty years ago ES was not even around and to chart patterns of S&P500 in the 80s than today, a good day was 4 points and S&P adhered to strong charting.


250 not 500
 
Back
Top