It's hard for me to see any U.S. ties to Russia…except for

Not a single instance where Schumer asked either Obama or Trump to fire Comey

What's with cons and their lack of comprehension, some say it's because of years of incest and inbreeding but I think it's just genetics.

No, just him saying he had no confidence in Comey whatsoever as head of the FBI. You can play on words all you want, but it's the same thing and everyone knows it.
 
No, just him saying he had no confidence in Comey whatsoever as head of the FBI. You can play on words all you want, but it's the same thing and everyone knows it.

So being specific is a problem now? Democrats also said that they have no confidence in Trump, when he is going to fire himself?

I asked specifically where Schumer asked Trump to fire Comey on the day grand jury subpoeans came out - and firing Comey for a reason Trump praised him for.
 
So being specific is a problem now? Democrats also said that they have no confidence in Trump, when he is going to fire himself?

If he did, would the Democrats cry foul and flip flop like they are with Comey?

I asked specifically where Schumer asked Trump to fire Comey on the day grand jury subpoeans came out - and firing Comey for a reason Trump praised him for.

Of course. That's all you've really got here - semantics. I suppose that's something, though.
 
If he did, would the Democrats cry foul and flip flop like they are with Comey?



Of course. That's all you've really got here - semantics. I suppose that's something, though.

No Democrat ever asked Trump to fire Comey which is what Trump did.

There is no semantics here, to pretend that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Clinton when in fact he praised Comey for exactly that is the semantics you disingenuous Cons are indulging in. Too bad, now Russia is all that everyone is gonna talk about as the grand jury indictments come rolling in.
 
No Democrat ever asked Trump to fire Comey which is what Trump did.

There is no semantics here, to pretend that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Clinton when in fact he praised Comey for exactly that is the semantics you disingenuous Cons are indulging in. Too bad, now Russia is all that everyone is gonna talk about as the grand jury indictments come rolling in.

First, it's all semantics. Saying you have no confidence in the head of the FBI is the same as saying he should be removed. You can pretend it's any other way if it makes your despair over losing the election any easier to take. Go right ahead. But the hypocritical behavior (on both sides, I might add) is plain to see for everyone watching.

As for "now Russia is all everyone is going to talk about" ...this is different from the last 5 months in what way? All you guys have been doing is whining about Russia every chance you get. No change there. And still no proof (which is what is the most important). But keep at it.
Bring on the Grand Jury. Hope there's not too much disappointment for you.
 
First, it's all semantics. Saying you have no confidence in the head of the FBI is the same as saying he should be removed.
.

Show me where Schumer said he should be removed first

You think I didn't notice your little lying there huh? I know all of your little right wing tricks LOL. I never met a honest right winger, not to say left wingers are any better but with the right wing, being disingenuous is a requirement rather than a character flaw
 
Show me where Schumer said he should be removed first

You think I didn't notice your little lying there huh? I know all of your little right wing tricks LOL. I never met a honest right winger, not to say left wingers are any better but with the right wing, being disingenuous is a requirement rather than a character flaw

You're having a hard time with reading comprehension in your effort to furiously rebut all these threads. I get it. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by copying and pasting my previous comment with some added clarification.

Saying you have no confidence in the head of the FBI is the same as saying he should be removed. You can pretend it's any other way if it makes your despair over losing the election any easier to take.
So it's not saying the same thing word for word, that's true. But it's essentially the same thing. If you want, I can link to a definition of the word "essentially" for you to get some further context.
 
But it's essentially the same thing. If you want, I can link to a definition of the word "essentially" for you to get some further context.

Hahahahah

Why don't you just admit you lied

'essentially'

LMFAO
 
I would, if I did. You should admit you do poorly in reading comprehension.

Should I admit 'essentially'? LOL

I asked a simple question and all I get is 'if you read it this way then ESSENTIALLY it means the same thing'.

Just show me ONE DEM who asked Trump to fire the guy - if Comey resigned on his own saying he made a mistake on the Clinton thing then there wouldn't be any controversy - but to fire the guy when grand jury indictments are coming out and your reason is that Comey was too harsh on Clinton when you praised him for it is the biggest bullshit I have heard in long time. But you are a Trump supporter, the king of bullshit. 'Mexico will pay for the wall' 'Don't intervene in Syria' 'No Goldman Sachs' HAHAHAHAHHAHA
 
Back
Top