That is an interesting point.
The one difference I can find between the late 2004/early 2005 time period and now is that the IWM did not retrace up to the rim. It just broke down.
I paged through the events we have ahead and there is a lot on the plate. These next 7 days are very crucial.
The one difference I can find between the late 2004/early 2005 time period and now is that the IWM did not retrace up to the rim. It just broke down.
I paged through the events we have ahead and there is a lot on the plate. These next 7 days are very crucial.
Quote from dtrader98:
Michael,
That was an interesting observation. I wanted to confirm it and also go back and see if I could find a contradicting case.
Lo and behold, I didn't have to go far at all. If you go back to the wedge period, before the two you identified, it has almost identical periodic and structural characteristics as well. The enclosed graph shows the outcome of superimposing the older patterns. The most interesting observation is both give exact opposite outputs! Therefore, we can't really conclude greater than 50/50 chance of either outcome based on this pattern analysis. Interestingly, the 1st period with the breakdown pattern looks more like the current one IMO.
BTW: I meant to say falling three methods pattern at end of wedges I and III.
Just another reason why I'm liking mandelbrot's thinking more and more
with each pattern analysis.
----------------------------------------------
Mandelbrot: Patterns are the fool's gold of financial markets. They are the inevitable consequence of the human need to find patterns in the patternless.
