Iterative Refinement
- Thread starter Spydertrader
- Start date
In my opinion saying that you appreciated comments or answers to your original question is a way of expressing gratitude...i don't know what kind of psycho babble disproves that those words don't express graciousness but in my view its saying thankyou.
Also that post provides the perfect example that I never wavered from the fact that I have read the journals but cannot recite them. I have a good knowledge of the journals and can go back for many of my broader and more generalized questions such as the IAAC trade in Journal 3 which I mention in the post.... BUT I cannot take every question I have and go back in my head and spontaneously come up with a page that has the answer regardless of how frequent the answer is posted. Noone can.
You still haven't addressed this question.... why take the energy to post that "the answers are out there" or "go look through the journals" when you can give the answer in as many words. My level of skill or difficulty with certain annotations has nothing to do with refusing to respond to this question.
There's an answer to the question and either i can get it from someone who knows immediately in five to ten words or I can throw darts at the board (metaphorically speaking) until I find someone who answered the post in March of 2005....hopefully....Whats the logical choice for me here?.... Post the question
You should stop wasting your time now. It might be less painful to go away.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1900010&highlight=dictionary#post1900010
Probably, because I answered your question in a previous post.
Listen, you obviously feel that a secret society exists where the goal is to make life difficult for those attempting to learn these methods. Nothing could be further from the truth. I spend a great deal of time, energy and effort responding to requests for information - as have numerous other contributors to these threads.
Nobody has an agenda for denegrating the beginner or laying the smack down on the new guy. Such thinking represents a failure to 'see' the facts and history of these discussions.
Why not simply review your own posting history, and see, if you don't repeat the same questions numerous times - even after receiving valid, true and accurate advice. I'll bet you'll notice a change in responses to you at about the six month of repeating the same questions over and over again.
In such an environment people begin to 'see' a pattern in such behavior, and historically, people have witnessed the exact same behavior from people who simply didn't bother doing the work required.
Fair or not, this is how things work, and this, is where we now find ourselves.
So, choose whichever logical path best suits your needs, but take a moment to think about your current world view before you head off towards the point of no return. Perhaps, this all results from a misunderstanding on the part of many - including myself - or perhaps, things really are as they seem. Whatever the real answer, at least now, people have expresssed their opinions, as well as, the facts which formed those views.
All that remains is a simple determination of - continuation or change.
- Spydertrader
I asked it again because I didn't feel as though it answered my question. Read closely it asks if it was an IBGS and if I should be cautious since I was long. It is AN answer but it doesnt answer the question. The Jokari states if Volume is Up and price is Up the price will continue Up. This has volume that is Up but no movement either way. Thus my question was should I be cautious and I followed it up with the next question to further clarify.... where is this in terms of the Jokari which doesn't have a box for Increasing Volume when Neutral Price Occurs. Saying i don't read the answer to a question I posted sounds delusional to me. Maybe people really do assume no one has ever read a word of any of the journals when they post on the board. Ive read the journals I'm not here to argue that. Assuming one would have all the information stored in their head after reading it is ludacris. And even more ludacris is the thought that every answer should be accepted regardless of if you're still confused or not..
Spyder: Learn the sequences from Point One to Point Two to Point Three, and you'll, not only 'see' change, but know the reason to hold.
Thanks a million for your taking the time to explain in such a detail for me. This morning I wrote the above sentence on a 3X5 card and had it next to my laptop to remind me of the sequences. My annotating became very relaxing this morning - still a lot of mistakes but relaxing
- I actually spotted bar 28 (11:45-11:50) as an FTT as it was forming - a great feeling to see that the FTT was confirmed by bar 29 .
I have a question in one of your earlier posts though:
you said "The formation FBO (which also forms an FTT) provides a near perfect signal for change. Since we had a Short Dominant Channel, prior to, this signal, our binary system has just received a signal to head long. "
Would you elaborate on why a formation FBO (FBO=Failed Break Out?) provide a signal for change? I thought Failed Break Out means "continue". I understand the "FTT" part but not the "formation FBO" - Please forgive if my question is too basic.
I'd like to post my first ES chart - Most of it was done in the evening and with your advice in mind - My concentration was solely on channels to match Gaussians. I appreciate if you can comment on it.
No words can be used to express your patience and I greatly appreciate it.
Thanks a million for your taking the time to explain in such a detail for me. This morning I wrote the above sentence on a 3X5 card and had it next to my laptop to remind me of the sequences. My annotating became very relaxing this morning - still a lot of mistakes but relaxing
- I actually spotted bar 28 (11:45-11:50) as an FTT as it was forming - a great feeling to see that the FTT was confirmed by bar 29 .I have a question in one of your earlier posts though:
you said "The formation FBO (which also forms an FTT) provides a near perfect signal for change. Since we had a Short Dominant Channel, prior to, this signal, our binary system has just received a signal to head long. "
Would you elaborate on why a formation FBO (FBO=Failed Break Out?) provide a signal for change? I thought Failed Break Out means "continue". I understand the "FTT" part but not the "formation FBO" - Please forgive if my question is too basic.
I'd like to post my first ES chart - Most of it was done in the evening and with your advice in mind - My concentration was solely on channels to match Gaussians. I appreciate if you can comment on it.
No words can be used to express your patience and I greatly appreciate it.