Quote from gravitonium77:
Can one assume then that when you said: "My goal includes making this process as clear and concise as possible. If at any time, someone feels a post requires additional clarification, please bring those comments to my immediate attention." at the beginning of the futures journal that this is no longer the case
Again, you've
chosen to equate
easy and
difficult with clear and unclear. Now,
which of the two sets of words did
I use
today to make my point, and which of the two sets did
you post today?
You
chose a meaning for my words that I did not imply or infer. Blame: Spydertrader
Quote from gravitonium77:
Very little is clear to me here. I would prefer to continue asking questions to get it clear. If my pursuit of clarity is getting in the way of what you are trying to do here, please let me know and I will stop.
I don't recall asking you to stop posting questions.
I don't have a problem with questions.
You have a problem with my
answers. Blame: Spydertrader
Quote from gravitonium77:
The implicaton here is that all people learn, understand, progress, and perceive the same way. This is patently false. A child with kinesthetic tendancies CAN NOT learn when information is presented in a visual way. This point can not be made strongly enough. My example here is not meant to an anlolgy of what is happening here. It's just one example. Many individuals, of all ages, suffer incredibly because others don't undertand that each human's neural pathways are different. These differences amount to virtually different languages. So, to say that because some people understood you, that the fault with undertanding lies with the indivual flies in the face of everything that modern behavioural psychology and biochemistry (among other subjects) has taught us.
Actaully, no. Again, that
wasn't the implication. Let's see if this gets through. The lesson here is this. If
some people can do a thing, then the reason you
cannot do that same thing results from
your own inabilities. Whether lazy, not skilled enough, not educated enough, not able to learn like the others or whatever other rationale exists, the
reason one cannot do that same thing isn't because the thing is impossible to do or the coach is impossible to understand. The
reason failure results from one's efforts is do the
individual who attempts to do a thing.
Whether
valid individual reasons exist or not represents an entirely
other question. Clearly, someone who loses legs in a car accident may find difficulty in learning to run a mile, but the difficulty results from their loss of legs, and not becuase it is impossble to a run a mile, nor because their running coach sucks.
Blame: Spydertrader
Quote from gravitonium77:
Where is this located?
Seriously? You
couldn't locate my definition after I posted it, at least
twice, and Aurum reposted it? You couldn't locate where I pinpointed the
exact bars which showed
examples, as well as bars which did not?
Blame: Spydertrader
Quote from gravitonium77:
I am fully aware and embracing the fact that my results are my responsiblity.
Alrighty then, let's take a look.
My advice:
Quote from Spydertrader:
So, anyone reading these words should start from this point forward by shifting their mindset.
Your decision? Debate the advice provided. Does this
sound like a shift in mindset to you?
Again, you equate
its your responsability with 'Spyder thinks I'm a lazy ass.' I don't recall inferring, implying or even posting those thoughts. I have no doubt you have put forth lots of effort. Hence the reason for your frustrations. However,
your ability to succeed or fail does
not involve
me. The consequences of your actions, or the rewards for your efforts, rest solely with
you.
The sooner you
choose to stop blaming
me (which you
repeatedly do, while at the same time, claiming to be accepting responsibility), the better your chances of success.
Once again, Blame: Spydertrader
Good Journey to you.
- Spydertrader
>
