ISIS-Mama suddenly wants to come home

El OchoCinco said:
Isnt the kid 18 months old? Listen to the shit his mom was subjected too, that was her choice, not his. You going to claim now that this 18 month old with American citizen relatives is not entitled to get pulled out of that shit and given a chance at a better life...
More...

So the kid can chain migrate his terrorist father, terrorist mother, and other terrorist relatives to the U.S. eventually. No thanks.

Children of terrorists who declared war on the United States should never be eligible to come to our country.

Both parents of this kid were members of a terrorist organization that harmed many Americans. The kid is not entitled in any manner to be in the United States.
 
Probably should be allowed back, if...we could stone her, make her keep her face covered, beat her with sticks, not allow her to drive, marry her daughter off at 11, assume she is "property," force her to only clean and cook, etc, etc...
 
smallfil said:
Judge: Where is Ms. Muthana?
Bailiff: Sorry, judge we have it on good authority that she has been detained?
Judge: Who detained her?
Bailiff: The Syria Sharia Law Court.
Judge: Fine by me. One less case for me!
More...
gwb-trading said:
So the kid can chain migrate his terrorist father, terrorist mother, and other terrorist relatives to the U.S. eventually. No thanks.

Children of terrorists who declared war on the United States should never be eligible to come to our country.

Both parents of this kid were members of a terrorist organization that harmed many Americans. The kid is not entitled in any manner to be in the United States.
More...

I don't know the status of the grandparents either. If they are still under green card, I would move them out too, especially if the woman was involved in isis-contact while in their household. ie. harboring an enemy of the united states. If they are citizens now then that is not do-able unless they lied on their application in some place. They are free also to go to another country and join the mother and the child.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
I don't know the status of the grandparents either. If they are still under green card, I would move them out too, especially if the woman was involved in isis-contact while in their household. ie. harboring an enemy of the united states. If they are citizens now then that is not do-able unless they lied on their application in some place. They are free also to go to another country and join the mother and the child.
More...

I would not go so far to automatically remove those in the United States legally under green cards. However I would eliminate all ability for them to do any further chain migrations of others to the U.S. -- while making it very clear they are being closely watched for terrorist connections. And if clear terrorist connections are discovered then they will be deported.

In many ways situations like these are a mess for the relatives in the U.S. who do not support terrorism. They should be the most vocal in denouncing their family members who support ISIS -- not whining that little junior terrorist dipshiat is not allowed back.
 
gwb-trading said:
I would not go so far to automatically remove those in the United States legally under green cards.
More...

It is moot now but if they had any knowledge of her isis contacts while she in their household I would be finding a way to move them out if they were still under green card. That is a privilege not a right and harboring an enemy of the united states would be evidence of the requirement to maintain moral turpitude under the state. Depends on what the facts were.

It is moot because I guess they are naturalized citizens now. I guess it is complicated too. The isis woman apparently was born in U.S. but Pompeo and company allege that her father was a diplomat and the relevant immigration treaty or statute apparently specifies that diplomats are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S within the language of the Constitution. Complicated. She will get a bunch of lefty lawyers and go round and round.

Fine, start with keeping her and her child out. No doubt her lawyers will be paid by the u.s. government.
 
elderado said:
I think all those "psychologists" who think Trump is delusional would believe that would be "therapy" for that bitch.
More...

Therapy?

I would send the bitch to Gitmo for five years of daily hydrotherapy.

411e14d9-85f7-44eb-88d7-fab871900a24.jpg
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Correct. "not entitled" to anything in this country. Absolutely nothing. "American citizen relatives" entitles you to absolutely nothing although you can use that as factor to support a legal application to come here. But "entitlement?" No. And Pompeo has already given her an answer to her request to come here so she can eat shit. And it is not our place to be reaching out to her to take her child and bring him here and I dont want him here either. I thought lefties were against separating children from their mothers.

If the mother insists that she is woke and reformed now, then she should give herself and her child a chance for a better life. There is the whole rest of the world out there for her to go and do that.

She was involved in an effort to support isis fighters who- among other things- killed many Americans. When are those Americans "entitled" to come home alive? We are constantly reminded that not all muslims are terrorists. Fine, let them go to one of the more civilized camel-lands and live happily ever after but stay the fuck out of this country. We are not running a home for Little ISIS Wanderers here.
More...
Awesome post!!!
 
Entitled = his grandparents sponsoring him coming home. Why is all your hate for her being dumped on an 18 month old child? Are you that much of a cold person?
If the grandparents petitioned to bring the child would you be against it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top