ISIS and beheadings...

Best response I've read.
I'D RATHER BE BEHEADED than be ruled by these sub-human extremists. I'd rather die in a trench, fighting for those I love, than be taken prisoner. I'd rather die after killing as many extremists as possible, and I will die with a smile on my face because I died for what I believed in; that there is a better way than genocide, that people can serve a greater purpose than that of evil. I will die believing that someday we as a whole will end our petty quarrels and work together to form a better world. These extremists aren't just the enemy to the US, they are the enemy to law and order, to peace and liberty, to everything good in this world. This war should not be about religion, but about ethics and morals. I have no problem with anyone's beliefs, but harm what I love; and I'll go to war
 
CaptainObvious said:
Best response I've read.
I'D RATHER BE BEHEADED than be ruled by these sub-human extremists. I'd rather die in a trench, fighting for those I love, than be taken prisoner. I'd rather die after killing as many extremists as possible, and I will die with a smile on my face because I died for what I believed in; that there is a better way than genocide, that people can serve a greater purpose than that of evil. I will die believing that someday we as a whole will end our petty quarrels and work together to form a better world. These extremists aren't just the enemy to the US, they are the enemy to law and order, to peace and liberty, to everything good in this world. This war should not be about religion, but about ethics and morals. I have no problem with anyone's beliefs, but harm what I love; and I'll go to war
More...
Really, they're not enemies of law and order; no, they love law and order too much. But maybe that makes them enemies of those. : )
 
piezoe said:
But unfortunately they are winning. Do you think the U.S. really "won" the Iraq war? Think again.
More...

I think NATO funds, creates, hypes and sheppards enemies of their own design to justify perpetual war. During the cold war, Russia was built up as this frothing aggressor bent on world domination, when it wasn't. Their economic and military capabilities were grossly overstated (besides nuclear capacity). Al Queda was funded and trained by American and British intelligence to combat the Soviets in Afghanistan (Mujahedeen). Osama Bin Laden was originally a CIA asset (Tim Osman). Saddam, backed by America. The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait (Gulf War#1) was actually greenlighted by the American ambassador to Iraq, at the time, which was a setup. Now, with ISIS, they originally fought in Libya supported by NATO to overthrow Gadaffi. They were the "Libyan rebels" we kept hearing about. They plundered much of the Libyan military cache, including 20,000 Russian shoulder fired SA-7 anti-aircraft missiles, and brought the "crusade" up to Syria, where again, NATO happily equipped them with American-made MPAD missiles and anti-tank missiles. After all, they were "rebels fighting that evil Assad". And still do to this day. And whoops, now they're slaughtering everyone they can get their hands on, so media has taken notice. Not such a cuddly little group of freedom fighters, after all?

Truth be told, the reason why Obama and the Pentagon have no official strategy on ISIS is because they don't want to create a strategy against ISIS. They want ISIS to flourish. Yes, flourish. The whole point that eludes everyone is that Oceania needs a credible threat to justify perpetual war. In this case, ISIS is a new credible threat, and Obama and the military industrial complex would much rather keep this threat alive and well, rather then snuff it out in a few short weeks, with crippling air strikes.

Think about it guys. The border is wide open. ISIS are inside the United States. ISIS was allowed to plunder 20,000 shoulder fired missiles from Gaddafis arsenal. ISIS was allowed to take over and control 6 oil fields in Syria and Iraq to fund their operation. ISIS was equipped with hundreds of MPADS and anti-tank missiles, from the US GOVERNMENT. This is unheard of. ISIS is our new Emmanual Goldstein. Bin Laden, the Taliban and Saddam are long gone. We need a new enemy to keep this war going, and we found one - Al Queda 2.0 (ISIS). So lets not stop the party too soon.


http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/0...-likely-fallen-into-isis-hands-officials-say/
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/179019#.VAahzbwg854
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/6/flow-of-anti-aircraft-missiles-to-syria-could-land/?page=all
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/18/business/al-khatteeb-isis-oil-iraq/
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/182482#.VAakC7H65eM
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/0...-global-catastrophe-if-unchecked-experts-say/
 
Last edited:
achilles28 said:
"... Truth be told, the reason why Obama and the Pentagon have no official strategy on ISIS is because they don't want to create a strategy against ISIS. They want ISIS to flourish. Yes, flourish. The whole point that eludes everyone is that Oceania needs a credible threat to justify perpetual war. In this case, ISIS is a new credible threat, and Obama and the military industrial complex would much rather keep this threat alive and well, rather then snuff it out in a few short weeks, with crippling air strikes.

Think about it guys..... We need a new enemy to keep this war going, and we found one - Al Queda 2.0 (ISIS). So lets not stop the party too soon.


http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/0...-likely-fallen-into-isis-hands-officials-say/
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/179019#.VAahzbwg854
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/6/flow-of-anti-aircraft-missiles-to-syria-could-land/?page=all
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/18/business/al-khatteeb-isis-oil-iraq/
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/182482#.VAakC7H65eM
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/0...-global-catastrophe-if-unchecked-experts-say/
More...

I've long postulated that Odumbo is in reality an Islamic TERRORIST who wants to destroy America.

Your hypothesis seems equally plausible.

:(
 
Scataphagos said:
I've long postulated that Odumbo is in reality an Islamic TERRORIST who wants to destroy America.

Your hypothesis seems equally plausible.

:(
More...

Obama certainly harbors Islamic, anti-American thought and sympathies. No doubt. If we go back and look at Bush Jr and Clinton, they both passed on several opportunities to kill OBL. Remember the 'airlift of evil'? When the US Airforce "accidently" evacuated hundreds of top Taliban officials to Pakistan, during the invasion?

Americans just can't come to grips with the fact a criminal element within their Government runs most of the Country.
 
achilles28 said:
Obama certainly harbors Islamic, anti-American thought and sympathies.
More...

A person with such sympathies should not be allowed to be POTUS! He obviously doesn't want to "lead" the country... to do that which is in America's best interest.. NOT EVER!

With his animosity towards America, why in the world would he even WANT to be POTUS? One reason only... BECAUSE HE WANTS TO DO US HARM! (That, and the vacations, golf, perks on the American taxpayer's dime, of course.) His campaign, rhetoric, actions... have all BEEN A SCAM SINCE DAY ONE!!

We all know of "Nigerian 419" scams... that's what Odumbo has done to ALL OF AMERICA!!

:(
 
Last edited:
achilles28 said:
I think NATO funds, creates, hypes and sheppards enemies of their own design to justify perpetual war.
More...
Either that or, perhaps, there is something fundamentally expansionary and competitive about Life on Earth.

Naw, couldn't be that simple.
 
Ricter said:
Either that or, perhaps, there is something fundamentally expansionary and competitive about Life on Earth.

Naw, couldn't be that simple.
More...

None of that was my opinion. It's all documented fact. I suggest you get informed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top