These are all great points that I would probably refute if I cared enough... But Musk is no Ford. He's more like a combination of Wozniak and Jobs. Wants to do huge things, and is a nerd.
The internet is the broadest Dunning-Kruger effect experiment to date. Give a man a keyboard, an ISP, and no matter how deep into the knowledgeless hinterlands exist the rabbit hole he has chosen to crawl down, he gets a voice. This deluge of random voices has twisted and knotted our world into something barely conceivable two decades ago. The disparity between information and knowledge is variable. Knowledge is empirical, information, especially the ejaculate of random internet participants is seldom a transfer of the empirical.
The future is always with us, just not in enough volume to be noticed by most. There are two glaringly obvious unstoppable drivers of EV's.
1. Carbon credits. They're a magnificent boon for govts. Create them out of thin air and impose them on anything that moves.The world wide marketing campaign is well underway, Global warming.
2. Demographics. Natural generational shifts, generally, if you're over 35 people just starting college think differently than you do even though you may not believe it. The next generation is not far behind them. The future will provide vastly different tool sets through materials and manufacturing engineering innovation. Don't fight the future.
There are 147 EV mfgs in China. Very few will survive. Tesla has only ~ 1% of that mkt. It's a slog and they may well fail there. Many foreign cos. do. Tesla owns "mindshare", can get financing, can solve mfg. problems and innovate. They have empirical knowledge others don't.
Yes very important to Millennials. Gives them bragging rights.And is the 0.6 sec faster to 60 mph important?
View attachment 201660
There is no place in the US where a Tesla can beat a 85mph fast low budget car.
And if the distance goes beyond 500 miles the Tesla can even not catch up with that budget car. Speed is totally irrelevant in the US. Only in Germany or a part of Australia speed is relevant. But then Tesla has the problem that it cannot use that speed for over 1 hour as speed needs a lot of electricity. 1 hour of full speed and it is game over for Tesla.
your focus is so narrow on the EV/Tesla issue my head is spinning. suffice to say; the speed , track times etc etc is simply a small part of the debate.
instead of nitpicking on what you (and all the others) are missing consider that an entire (largest in the world) industry is putting billions (each.ie:volkswagon) to EV... why is this so?
As long as the batteries and charging times don't improve dramatically these EV are no option.
If batteries can do 500 miles in ANY condition (so not to worry about the real range because of using lights, airco, or low temperatures) and batteries cannot load in a few minutes, they are no option.
For a decade it took hours to recharge my phone. People found ways to work around it. Are you really that small minded
I cannot replace my actual car with any EV because I would lose lots of time. I cannot do a 10 hours trip with my car, using an EV that will take me 2 days to do the same trip. I would have to fully recharge 2 times before I can reach my destiny and drive much slower. It's about practicality, not about small minded. And there should be enough charging points (Europe).