Quote from Cavendish:
To correct a couple of points I have made that may have been misinterpreted:
1. institutions certainly do use leverage, but are aware of the level and danger of it. in my opinion 800 percent levered can be okay on bond contracts, with leverage calculated as gross contract value over supporting assets. equity market neutral levered at 800 is on the high side, and FX also. The natural leverage in credit default swap contracts is also manageable, but personally I keep the level down due to continued tightness of spreads. Emerging market assets run lower levels of leverage.
2. I have nothing against short term trading, but believe the commissions are key at this level, and VWAP execuion by Lehman or Goldman becomes as important as the system.
Scalping though and trading rumours and news is a world away from this framework though, and in my opinion is statistical noise.
bear in mind though this is only my view, and the funds I co-manage today dropped over forty million USD, so am always happy to engage in debate with the informed.
(Those in garages need not apply, but thanks for providing my liquidity)
Cavendish,
You just revealed one of the central points in the original discussion. While institutional traders can measure the use of leverage based on a gross contract value over supporting assets, small traders usually tend to use it in relation with the potential profits they can make and itâs particularly high when trading FX (which is ironically exactly the opposite approach to institutions).
Thatâs exactly the dilemma of the small day trader. Where is the line between risk, leverage and performance? If commissions, execution, small capital, and high leverage are against the small trader, and I ratify in my original opinion, one of the few options to minimize this impact is to aim for realistic targets in relation with capital invested.
jjrvat