Quote from Kevin Schmit:
It is easier to make money consistently, year after year, with
a large account than with a small one.
Trading multiple modlels and strategies, it is much harder for
your mistakes to be fatal. And that is the key to consistency.
Do all of you who think you can make 300% plus per annum
consistently really believe that you can out-trade Jim Simons
with his 150 Phd's?" He makes, before fees, 60% a year,
year in and year out. And Rentec is the best there is. Do
you really think you can do five times as well trading one
contract of YM off of QuoteTracker? You're delusional!
.
First of all, why would anyone compare their trading to anyone elses? Trading is individualistic. Styles, tolerances, instruments, goals, systems, etc.
Second, as I said, large accounts can't concentrate, they must diversify, and because of size, they don't day-trade. Even if they do daytrade, it would only be a very small portion of the total portfolio. Percentage returns from daytrading would be insignificant in reference to total portfolio. Based on diversification, I concede it's less likely all positions go awry. But I'm flat at eod, everyday. And on any given day, my total exposure to market risk is usually less then 3 hours. I trade all day, but few trades are held longer than 20m. Based on market exposure, less is better, imo.
Third, I go for 300% per month!! Not per annum. 8% (80$) per $1000 of account value per day. And I don't care if it comes in 1 trade or 100 trades in a day. The key is concentration, not diversification, and risk management. I intentionally rebalance my account to avoid the pitfalls of large... I'm not trying to be Simons. BTW; volente wants to bet he can take 4K to 19K in 30 days. Knowing what I know, it's a suckers bet.
Comparing yourself to other traders makes you delusional.