Not true because you're mixing together two different purposes.
The purpose of the identification is to determine if its a pullback or a reversal and you can do such without hindsight. Thus, you can do such in real-time as it is occurring.
In contrast, the second issue is at the moment you determine what it is...there's no such thing as "absolute certain" that it will continue as such after your entry.
Thus, be careful how you mix up the purpose because its best to keep them separated and there's no such thing as "absolute certain". Further, that's why I keep saying (multiple times in this thread)...do not become a one dimensional trader because they are the ones that if they determine its a pullback and then the market does something different after entry...they usually freeze like a deer on a dark rode when it sees headlights...results usually not pretty.
Therefore, it only make sense to be prepared if that pullback on entry decides to do something else after entry and you'll then no longer need to look for "absolute certain" results as if you're trying to outsmart the markets.
Best to just concentrate on trying to be profitable (prepare for different outcomes) instead of smart (absolute certain).
Prepare for different outcomes = Dynamic Trader
Nowhere did I suggest that anyone should search for absolute certainty. Quite the opposite. No one can trade with hindsight, hence there is no absolute certainty in trading. Forgive me for not belaboring the obvious.
