Here is my opinion and not that it matters.
If you have talent, why let somone else reep the benefits? Unless the payout is with the time. I have tossed around the idea of a fund myself and still do time to time. I actually had an investor call me last night and ask if I would start a fund using his money, with a 20/80 split.. I laughed and those of you who manage funds should too.
Let me tell you, they need you as much as you need them. I kindly explained that I wouldn't even consider the deal unless it was a 50:50 split as both, money and the talenr are worth the same price, in my eyes.
As fund managers, you should take approach that your hard work is worth more than 20 or even 30%.
With my lengthy track record I wouldn't consider anything less than 50%.
So to answer your question, I would stick with prop.
If you have talent, why let somone else reep the benefits? Unless the payout is with the time. I have tossed around the idea of a fund myself and still do time to time. I actually had an investor call me last night and ask if I would start a fund using his money, with a 20/80 split.. I laughed and those of you who manage funds should too.
Let me tell you, they need you as much as you need them. I kindly explained that I wouldn't even consider the deal unless it was a 50:50 split as both, money and the talenr are worth the same price, in my eyes.
As fund managers, you should take approach that your hard work is worth more than 20 or even 30%.
With my lengthy track record I wouldn't consider anything less than 50%.
So to answer your question, I would stick with prop.