Quote from USAtrader:
My point Don is that you are stressing the positives of prop, and not the negatives, while doing the opposite with running money. There are pros and cons to each.
A matter of perspective and the trader's view of him or herself. Some people like the security of a job type arrangement, some are willing to take more risk.
My brother was an accountant for a Fortune 500 company for 10 years when he decided to pack up his wife and 3 young children to move to Las Vegas to see if he could make a good living playing blackjack. After a year of playing small (proof of concept) he moved up his bet sizes and made $millions over the next couple of years. It became more and more difficult to play due to being barred everywhere, so after 3 years he moved his "game" to the Options floor (1978), brought me in 1979. We've been very fortunate, but without that feeling of "risk reward" we would likely still have jobs (I was in public accounting, yuk, LOL).
We had to buy seats of course, but the same business model we engage in now is what we enjoyed back then.
If a person wants to become a trader, I think that the same route Bob and I followed is a good one. Stay independent, get free or cheap use of adequate capital, take some small amount of risk, and work your a$% off for a few years. Much better than attempting the strictly retail course, IMO. As exchange members we were able to do things that retail could not, which obviously helped us. Same today, again, IMO.
Cons of our business model? Depends greatly on the Firm, of course. You have some monthly overhead, and you may have to pay some exchange fees. Overall pretty minor.
And, 99.9% of those who want to get into trading for a living won't be able to find a group with $10million to donate to the cause, again, IMO. It's much easier to start a business with a bit of risk capital (no franchise fees, the money is still yours unless you lose it).
Don
