Quote from USAtrader:
Don,
A couple things that come into play here:
Not that I argue with you, but some things are unclear. In general, but specifically at Bright since you are the one responding here:
Does bright offer futures?
To those who qualify, but when traders see how much less risky, and highly rewarding, some of our strategies are, they stop doing futures.
Secondly:
Prop Trader: Experienced trader with access to and uses 5 million, with 50k in account. He loses 60k in one shot. What typically happens? He's either done w/o added capital or buying power is reduced to didly(sp?) squat. Does Bright work differently than this typical prop situation?
There has been fewer than 5 traders in 20 years who have ever had that problem. When traders have their own money up, and are qualified, licensed, blah blah, they rarely would allow this to happen. Bright is responsible for any excess losses, and we have worked with deficit traders in the past who are now quite wealthy (case by case basis).
Same trader but in fund structure: 5 million capital, loses 250k. What happens? He's still in business. He can go on as usual. What if he loses another 250k? He's still in business.
"in business making nothing" and not in business for long. Why would people keep money in a little fund like that, run by one guy who loses money?
So there are benefits. Of course if all you do is compare 20% vs. 100% on = capital then you have an answer. But that's not the only issue. In this kind of prop you don't grow then from your 5mil capital to 150mil capital in various markets. Apples/Oranges as it pertains to the growth potential.
FD: Private/Prop
And, as I said, good discussion, and to each his own.
Don