Is Capital Punishment ever justified?

Is Capital Punishment Ever Justified?

  • Yes

    Votes: 39 354.5%
  • No

    Votes: 21 190.9%

  • Total voters
    11
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

You can stray from the proper methods of debate, by the use of strawman arguments, ad hominess attacks, exaggeration, changing the point etc., but the fact remains that you refused to address many of the points, valid points, of my last post.

The more evolved person, can discern the difference between an evil act, and evil itself.

Killing is not evil, as killing in self defense is not considered evil.

It is in the intent that evil is characterized and judged. It is the mind that kills, as the body is a slave to the mind. So, it is essentially the thinking, which rules the mind that leads to action, deemed either good or evil action.

You have claimed that some people are evil, yet provide no explanation for that belief. When I ask for proof, you retort like a child "prove it doesn't."

The responsibility is not on my side to prove that people aren't evil. People can act with evil intent, but people can also, and have also reformed from their evil intents of the past.

St. Paul is a famous individual who was able to reform, able to change, able to see things differently.

There are many who try to explain his conversion process, from both spiritual and scientific perspectives, but the fact which remains is that he did in fact change his point of view.

The human mind is capable of change.

The mind is still mysterious to most of us. No doubt, we are just in the primitive stages of understanding brain chemistry and human psychology, and those "demons" that cause man to act in an evil manner.

My point is, that if it not necessary to kill to protect others, if redemption is possible, from both a scientific and religious perspective (I am speaking New Testament here, as Jesus taught forgiveness and redemption), they why on earth would a peace loving, evolved, religious, compassionate, and scientific person not give science or religion an opportunity to reform a soul?

You would kill that person who committed acts of evil, without even having an explanation as to the cause of the evil actions.

You would deny a soul their chance for redemption, rehabilitation, by unnecessary termination of their life for the sake of vengeance, which isn't your God granted right to act upon.

Should we give scientists and theologians every possible chance to discover and heal the minds of men who are compelled to take the life of another man?

Yes, by all means.

(sigh)

Optional, normally a post from you as insulting as this (i.e. "more evolved person," "like a child") would elicit a response of equal measure. You talk about St. Paul, I can bring in St. Thomas Aquinas. We could debate "evil" forever, etc., etc. Perhaps that's what you want, a sequel to our previous encounter, which, to put mildly, went very badly for you.

Regardless, as tempted as I am to continue arguing with you, especially with the holes in your argument and reality that are IMHO the size of the Titanic, I think you must agree that we are just going in circles, repeating the same things over and over ad nauseum and getting nowhere.

Clearly, we are never going to agree on this issue. So, before I give in to temptation and make this the full-on flame war it is gradually becoming, I will simply say that I disagree vehemently with your opinion but respect your right to have it.
 
Quote from hapaboy:



(sigh)

Optional, normally a post from you as insulting as this (i.e. "more evolved person," "like a child") would elicit a response of equal measure. You talk about St. Paul, I can bring in St. Thomas Aquinas. We could debate "evil" forever, etc., etc. Perhaps that's what you want, a sequel to our previous encounter, which, to put mildly, went very badly for you.

Regardless, as tempted as I am to continue arguing with you, especially with the holes in your argument and reality that are IMHO the size of the Titanic, I think you must agree that we are just going in circles, repeating the same things over and over ad nauseum and getting nowhere.

Clearly, we are never going to agree on this issue. So, before I give in to temptation and make this the full-on flame war it is gradually becoming, I will simply say that I disagree vehemently with your opinion but respect your right to have it.

You lose.
 
Quote from hapaboy:



(YAWN)

Big loser dGAB can't own up that he's wrong, or that he continues to make a complete jackass of himself on this thread.

If ignorance were a disability, you'd get the full pension.

You're not going to threaten to ban me again, are you? :D

I can't say it'll never happen, but what would be the point? You have already succeeded in marginalizing yourself anyway. You are a self limiting disease.
 
Quotes from hapaboy:



(YAWN)

Just admit you've put your foot in your mouth AGAIN, dGAB.

Ya know, with one more neuron you'd have a synapse.

Ya know, if you cease writing laughable garbage like this all the time, grow your hair long to hide the scars, and learn to control the slobbering, no one will ever know you've had a lobotomy.

As far as your "perhaps indicates other personal failures" statement, all I can say in my defense is that at least I know of two people who are unequivocally bigger failures than I: the unfortunate couple that spawned you.

Make up your mind or get some schizophrenia therapy!

HOW MANY TIMES MUST I FLUSH TO BE RID OF YOU?!?

The great Optional777 - bowed, bitch-slapped, and soundly beaten. Even the French would have put up more of a fight.

Keep putting your foot in your mouth, ya dolt. You're very good at it.


What a well rounded debater!

Your haunt seems to be a well known website devoted to insults. Not surprising you can't generate an original insult.

Here's something you quoted and so aptly describes you:

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
- Socrates
 
Legend in his own mind, still reigning champion of the non-sequitur, the self-appointed winner is..........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
HAPABOY.jpg
 
Notice that I did make an effort to honor your request and tried to "behave," unlike dgabriel and Optional.

It's unfortunate how those whose opinions are in the minority at times must resort to noise and spectacle to hide their pathetic intellects and debating skills.

Excuse me while I go bitch-slap 'em.....:D
 
Quote from dgabriel:

I can't say it'll never happen, but what would be the point? You have already succeeded in marginalizing yourself anyway. You are a self limiting disease.
ROFL! You're such a pathetic hypocrite, dGAB.

Yeah, I'm so marginalized more than 2/3 of the poll is in favor of capital punishment, much like public opinion at large. Capital punishment is on the books of 38 states. Your opinion is in the minority. I know that drives you and Optional nuts; maybe someday science will find a cure for what ails you both - it will definitely take more research in the field of proctology, specifically the removal of heads shoved all the way up the anal tract.

Quote from dgabriel:

What a well rounded debater!

Your haunt seems to be a well known website devoted to insults. Not surprising you can't generate an original insult.

Here's something you quoted and so aptly describes you:

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
- Socrates
Please advise of the URL of that "well known website." I'm always in the mood for a good laugh. OR, is it most likely another invention of your imagination, such as the names and incidents of innocent people that have been executed in the US? LOL!

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Legend in his own mind, still reigning champion of the non-sequitur, the self-appointed winner is..........

You guys are a terrific tag team, the Beavis and Butthead of ET. Very impressive how you work together and combine your inanity. So talented!

What do you do for an encore? Fart in unison?

:cool:
 
Back
Top