Tsing Tao Sep 4, 2012 #2 Based almost entirely on the stock market performance. Not an especially good indicator by itself.
JamesL Sep 6, 2012 #4 Quote from walter4: Never been wrong.. More... Notice where the numbers were right before the actual ruling
Quote from walter4: Never been wrong.. More... Notice where the numbers were right before the actual ruling
J John_Wensink Sep 6, 2012 #5 Funny stuff. Check how high corzine's numbers were before Christie beat him. Quote from walter4: Never been wrong.. More...
Funny stuff. Check how high corzine's numbers were before Christie beat him. Quote from walter4: Never been wrong.. More...
A AK Forty Seven Sep 6, 2012 #6 Bush /Kerry Obama /McCain 2008 House 2008 Senate 2010 House(From July until election day they had Republicans taking the House over 50) Wisconsin recall( Had Walker over 50 the life of the contract)
Bush /Kerry Obama /McCain 2008 House 2008 Senate 2010 House(From July until election day they had Republicans taking the House over 50) Wisconsin recall( Had Walker over 50 the life of the contract)
Pekelo Sep 6, 2012 #7 Quote from Tsing Tao: Based almost entirely on the stock market performance. More... It is probably poll based. Even the Reps don't want a Mormon president... By the way fivethirtyeight gives similar chances based on the Electoral College. Obama's lead is 311 to 226: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
Quote from Tsing Tao: Based almost entirely on the stock market performance. More... It is probably poll based. Even the Reps don't want a Mormon president... By the way fivethirtyeight gives similar chances based on the Electoral College. Obama's lead is 311 to 226: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/