God by definition is omnipresent, so no need to "add" that term.
As explained above, God "adding" to Himself, taking from Himself, and moving it to another part of Himself all happens with God, who is omnipresent.
Omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent are all descriptions of God's nature.
These terms don't define God or limit God, we try to use words to describe understand God who is beyond the limits of this universe.
The English language is very tricky because the words can mean different things.
This is why some philosophers in the past have said that God cannot be defined, because defining by the human mind is imposing a limited condition of boundaries of conditions words onto that which cannot be bound or be subject to external conditions.
As explained above, God "adding" to Himself, taking from Himself, and moving it to another part of Himself all happens with God, who is omnipresent.
Omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent are all descriptions of God's nature.
These terms don't define God or limit God, we try to use words to describe understand God who is beyond the limits of this universe.
The English language is very tricky because the words can mean different things.
This is why some philosophers in the past have said that God cannot be defined, because defining by the human mind is imposing a limited condition of boundaries of conditions words onto that which cannot be bound or be subject to external conditions.
Quote from DerekD:
This works if and only if your conceptualization of God is that it is omnipresent. In that respect, if you say God +1, you void the concept of omnipresence.
I think you just needed to add the word "omnipresent."