Intelligent Design is not creationism

God by definition is omnipresent, so no need to "add" that term.

As explained above, God "adding" to Himself, taking from Himself, and moving it to another part of Himself all happens with God, who is omnipresent.

Omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent are all descriptions of God's nature.

These terms don't define God or limit God, we try to use words to describe understand God who is beyond the limits of this universe.

The English language is very tricky because the words can mean different things.

This is why some philosophers in the past have said that God cannot be defined, because defining by the human mind is imposing a limited condition of boundaries of conditions words onto that which cannot be bound or be subject to external conditions.


Quote from DerekD:

This works if and only if your conceptualization of God is that it is omnipresent. In that respect, if you say God +1, you void the concept of omnipresence.

I think you just needed to add the word "omnipresent."
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

"Only you accept your own definition of God. Most people don't."

Only I accept, but "most" people don't?

Only I and most? That suggests that some do accept my definition, which would mean the statement that "only you accept" is false.

Funny.

Try "Only you accept your own definition of God. No other person does."


__________________________________

The +1 that God would "add" to Himself would be taking something from Himself and "adding" it to Himself, but that doesn't change the totality of God, doesn't make God greater. It is not really addition which results in a sum greater or lessor than the initial totality.

The absurd idea of stu was that God +1=Gilbert assumes that God can be added to, which is impossible by definition.

God by definition is the greatest. Nothing greater, no means to be greater. Nothing to add, nothing to subtract, complete totality without any boundary. Nothing outside to add to God, nothing outside to move something from God to the outside.

In a skin graft for burn victims, doctors sometimes take the patient's own skin from one part of their body and graft it to another area.

Are they "adding" skin to the patient?

Not really, they are just moving it from one place to another.

With God, since everything is contained within God, adding 1 would be nothing but moving +1 from where it was (within God) to where it already is (within God).

So the word "add" the way it was used by stu suggests that an increase can come from adding +1 to God, and I am saying it is impossible to increase God by definition. Just as moving skin from one part of the body, subtracting the skin from one place and adding (moving) it to another place on the body doesn't increase the amount of skin.

This is why there is no contradiction in saying that you cannot add +1 to God (meaning you cannot increase God's value), and the idea of increasing God's value is illogical, because it is not a possibility.

The suggestion that an all powerful God should be able to reduce His own power is again illogical, and if He can't then he is not all powerful is just an absurdity. There is no possibility to increase or reduce the power of God.

God can "add" +1 to Himself, but it doesn't increase His value because he is simply producing +1 from Himself and moving it from Himself to Himself.

God cannot increase or decrease His value, that is logically impossible by definition. Moving parts around is not addition or subtraction of value.

If I have a box of numbers, and I take a number from one corner and move it to another corner of the box, have I increased the total numbers or increased the value of the numbers of the sum of the numbers?

Nope.

I subtract it from the right corner of the box box, and add it back to the left corner of the box, and the value is unchanged....so this "addition" and "subtraction" don't have the same meaning as taking a number away from the box or bringing another number into the box.

...you are defining God limitations.
 
God has no size, so God is not limited to one size.

The concept of size does not apply to God.

Size is a relativistic term, as it relates to different sizes or something that can be measured.

God is not relativistic, and God is immeasurable. There is nothing that can measure God, as there is nothing outside of God. Measurement is a comparative process. It begins at one point in time, and then records the measurement or distance from that starting point to a different point in time.

God is without comparison.

There is no point which is not God, no time or space which is not God, so the idea of a size of God is absurd.


Quote from trendlover:

Because god can not add to himself or take away from himself, Then god is limited to one size.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

God has no size, so he is not limited to one size.

Size is a relativistic term, as it relates to different sizes or something that can be measured.


God is not relativistic, and God is immeasurable. There is nothing that can measure God, as there is nothing outside of God. Measurement is a comparative process. It begins at one point in time, and then records the measurement or distance from that starting point to a different point in time.

God is without comparison.

There is no point which is not God, no time or space which is not God, so the idea of a size of God is absurd.

God is said to be smaller than the smallest and larger than the largest.
.... are all limitations of God
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

My definition is that God is complete and cannot added unto from outside
... limitation
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

God cannot increase or decrease His value
... limitation

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Nothing is outside of God by definition
...limitation
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

It is impossible to add +1 to God
.....limitation
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

God is without want by definition
....limitation
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

God is not limited by definition.
quote from TrollZZZzzz
......"I am saying it is impossible to increase God by definition"

......"you are attempting to absurdly impose on God."
quote from TrollZZZzzz
 
What's the harm in admitting that a conceptualization of god has limits? How is that disparaging?

If your conceptualization is that God is the highest of the high, wouldn't it stand to reason that God can do all POSSIBLE things?


For instance, in relation to omnipotence, wouldn't stand to reason that God is the most powerful entity in existence? Clearly, there is no conceptualization of God where God can do any and everything. But at the same time, there is no known conceptualization where anything is more powerful than god.

Or in relation to omniscience, God would know all that can be known.

If God can't do something, it's a limit. Big deal. Most modern conceptualizations of God are still more powerful than anything created. And isn't that what counts?
 
Back
Top