Intelligent Design is not creationism

Quote from volente_00:

If humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes ?


There is no longer any doubt -- with your above question you have established yourself either as a simple (minded) troll, or a total idiot.

I don't draw much of a distinction between the two.

JB
 
Quote from Turok:

I am a superior being, there is no longer any doubt -- I have proved that to myself which is all that matters and with my answers I have established myself either as an extremely advanced (minded) meaningful person, or a total genius beyond the understanding of others. My life is completely meaningful, which is why I spend so much time helping my others to have a life as meaningful to them as mine is to me.



Bwaahaahaaaaaa.......aha!
 
Virgina, state.

West Virgina, state.

Same species...no new species, no evolution of species.

Try again with something that works...

Quote from smilingsynic:

For the same reason why Virginia still exists even though West Virginia broke away from it in 1863.
 
Nothing in evolutionary theory has excluded the possibility of life by design. There no reason why the suggested evolution can't be a designed feature of the universe.

Limited knowledge brings limited results, which is why all the evolutionary theory in the world has not really brought us anything of tremendous value. Everything done is the lab could have been accomplished just the same with scientists who held to an ID belief system.

Evolutionary theory provides no answers at all as to why proposed evolutionary processes even exists or originated. None...except admissions of ignorance disguised as "random chance" process within a non random constraint of immutable laws of nature and physics.

There is such an enormous gap between figuring out how something works...and finding out why it even exists in the first place, and/or what its purpose is.

The anti-ID crowd is terrified of the ultimate questions they have no answers for, so they find contentment in suckling on the nipple of of conditional, propositional, and fractionally limited truths...

Quote from smilingsynic:

Biblical creationists like Morris do not agree with the ID movement's general disinterest in the authority of the Bible. Simply put, many in the ID movement reject the fundamentalism of Morris, Gish, and other creationists.

Both the ID movement and biblical creationists believe in an intelligent designer, however. They disagree on the identity of that designer. ICR and Ken Ham's organization "Answers in Genesis" would consider the "designer" to be the God (they believed is) revealed in the Bible. Those in the ID movement generally frown on biblical creationists, because they are well aware that the group has little to no scientific credibility.

Nevertheless, the combined efforts of biblical creationists and the ID movement have not been enough (not even close) to dismantle evolutionary theory. Their battle, at least in terms of science and the search for truth, appears in vain.

Now may we close this thread down, finally. :)
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Nothing in evolutionary theory has excluded the possibility of life by design. There no reason why the suggested evolution can't be a designed feature of the universe.

Natural selection does not NEED a creator. It works fine as is

Moreover, evolutionary theory is not concerned about proving or disproving a creator/intelligent designer.

Cosmology is not in the realm of science.

I thought I put you on ignore, troll. Gee, better fix that.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Virgina, state.

West Virgina, state.

Same species...no new species, no evolution of species.

Try again with something that works...

No, troll, DNA evidence reveals that all life had common ancestor, and additional evidence shows that humans broke away from apes around 5-6 million years ago.

Those who reject natural selection really have not seen the evidence.
 
Natural selection theory is an invention of the human mind...

Evolutionary theory is an invention of the human mind...

Moreover, even if they do exist separate from human mid, there is nothing that prevents them from having come into being by the work and plan of a designer...

Man, you are so foolish you don't even know how to use an ignore button....

What a bloomin' idiot you are...

Quote from smilingsynic:

Natural selection does not NEED a creator. It works fine as is

Moreover, evolutionary theory is not concerned about proving or disproving a creator/intelligent designer.

Cosmology is not in the realm of science.

I thought I put you on ignore, troll. Gee, better fix that.
 
No, DNA doesn't reveal a common ancestor...that concept of a common ancestor is nothing but a human developed theory that assumes evolution was at work, and is the projection of one possible explanation based on a conceptual and projected extrapolation from hard data. It is just one of many circular reasonings based on the foundation of the theory of evolution of the species.

How did you get so brainwashed anyway? You are as bad as the fundamentalist Christians and fundamentalist Muslims who also speak in dogmatic absolutes where none exist outside of the human mind...

Good gosh, whoever thought science would plunge into the insanity of creed and dogma...


Quote from smilingsynic:

No, troll, DNA evidence reveals that all life had common ancestor, and additional evidence shows that humans broke away from apes around 5-6 million years ago.

Those who reject natural selection really have not seen the evidence.
 
Me:
> ... you have established yourself either as a
>simple (minded) troll, or a total idiot.


Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Bwaahaahaaaaaa.......aha!


And in your case, there is no question as to the catagory(s) to which you belong.

JB
 
Quote from Turok:

Me:

I belong in the category of the superior, living a full life only interested in helping the lesser others achieve my own status of personal greatness and fully living life.

The greatness of me is undeniable.
JB
 
Back
Top