Who cares what Behe or Dawkins' believes.Quote from Teleologist:
Stu wrote:
You are confusing the origin of life with the evolution of species. Molecular machines were part of the first cells. They pre-date plant and animal species by a couple of billion years. Crick and Orgel's hypothesis of Directed Panspermia claims that the first cells on earth were the product of intelligent design. It logically follows that the molecular machines that were part of those cells were also intelligently designed. There is no difference between Crick and Orgel's Directed Panspermia hypothesis and Behe's hypothesis when it comes to the origin of molecular machines. Both posit a telic origin for them.
Stu wrote:
No it isn't. Behe is skeptical of a non-telic orgin of life just as Crick and Orgel were. And like Crick and Orgel he accepts that species evolve. There is simply no logical reason why one can't be skeptical of a non-telic origin of life and at the same time accept that species evolve.
Quote from Hansel H:
Yes and almost certainly.
Actually, there was a very recent study released showing that religious practices tend to make people happier and healthier.Quote from acronym:
Wonderfull, a definitive opinion!
Ok, HOW would it affect your daily life, why is it so important?
Outside the religious realm of eternal punishment and bollocks, your quest for peace of mind is so great that these things are the only relevant issues for you?
This is a key factor here, WHY do people need to know, WHY do they need to beleive in something, no matter how ludicrous.
Im not trying to sound sarcastic , i often come across that way, but its practically a miracle someone admits they "need" answers, which is a basic human condition imo, the price of being a sentient being.
How, and why, would it make a difference to know, is the question I pose.
Quote from neophyte321:
the most ironic thing about this whole argument is that scientists , by-and-large, devote themselves to one idea ... perfection.... an idea laymen and the devout refer to as god
Quote from kjkent1:
Actually, there was a very recent study released showing that religious practices tend to make people happier and healthier.
So, while I don't subscribe to religious practice, it apparently provides a selective advantage for those who do.
A supreme irony.
Quote from acronym:
Total rubbish, scientists are just engineers, working on problems/solutions, finding out stuff no other bastard has the skills to find out.
Perfection is bollocks, an engineers approach is to find what works, what is practical, what actually helps the physical reality.
Perfection does not enter the equation, THAT is left to hippy koomba-ah spiritualists, religious freaks and the almightylly (thats not an actual word, is it) unenlightened.
Absolute piffle, your argument is rubbish.
Your an apoligist for the great unwashed, stoopid, half witted retards of the world, well great. Just great.
Hope that goes well for you.
Quote from acronym:
Perfection does not enter the equation, THAT is left to hippy koomba-ah spiritualists, religious freaks and the almightylly (thats not an actual word, is it) unenlightened.