If you let your bigotry take a break you might realize the Buddhist denomination for instance does not accept there is intelligent design. So your denomination "theory" falls at the first fence.
For the sake of an incorrect assertion based upon your own personal "chance" prejudice, you would be teaching children dogma founded upon simple falsehoods like that.
ID/Creationism doesn't stand , so you want to to piggy back science class in order to steal some of sciense's credibility for your own misplaced misinformations.
And to think you would be prepared to deprive children of understanding to re- place with incorrect information, only to defend an irrational assertion .
For the sake of an incorrect assertion based upon your own personal "chance" prejudice, you would be teaching children dogma founded upon simple falsehoods like that.
ID/Creationism doesn't stand , so you want to to piggy back science class in order to steal some of sciense's credibility for your own misplaced misinformations.
And to think you would be prepared to deprive children of understanding to re- place with incorrect information, only to defend an irrational assertion .
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Irrational and off point response.
My argument is that ID accepts all denominations, does not argue against any denomination, but that ID itself if non denominational.
Denominations don't accept each other, but that is not the point, nor the point I was making, nor is it relevant to ID.
All denominations accept theory of intelligent design over ignorant chance.
Now, if you are going to admit that ignorant chance theory is a religion and a denomination of atheism, then ID accepts all denominations and does not argue with them, with the exception of the denomination of ignorant chance which is a branch of Atheistic religion.
It would be nice, and intellectually honest, though I doubt that is very probably if at all possible, for the proponents of ignorant chance to admit they have an atheistic driven agenda primarily, not a scientific one. The goal is to use science as a tool to promote atheism, or as a tool to attack theism.
Slim chance that will happen though...