Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
So you are seriously suggesting that Santa Claus is the origin of mankind?
Quote from 2cents:
in what way? how do you know there is no isomophism between Santa Clausism, ID & creationism??? plse enlighten us zizzz
as u wish my son, lets continue to teach science, and not faith since faith need not be taught...Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
I have no interest in teaching them your theory, thanks anyway.
My preference is that we teach no faith based science, like is currently being propagated in the public school systems.
Teach science, not faith...
Not knocking your own personal faith in Santa Claus, to each their own.
And your confusion continues, I am not your son...
Quote from traderNik:
I sure as hell think that!!
I think that it is self-evident that Santa Claus is the Creator of life on Earth and I believe we should be teaching that in schools alongside evolution.
Isn't that what you want too? To teach alternatives to evolution, considering that you feel the evolutionary viewpoint is being rammed down the throat of children by those darn Atheistic Evolutionists?
Quote from 2cents:
as u wish my son, lets continue to teach science, and not faith since faith need not be taught...
and for people who've got fundamental problems with the concept of randomness in biology, the origin of life etc, there are appropriate scientific frameworks of research for who knows how to look
TraderNik wrote:Nonsense. Quote me a single sentence in which Dawkins refers to himself as a "Darwinist." It's a title that the religious zealots and ignorant media put on him, against his own protests..
Time for James Bond and TraderNik to eat a little crow.lol... why do I think that Zeleologist will fail to provide any evidence for his assertion that Dawkins referred to himself as a Darwinist.
Quote from jem:
Listen again.
He stated that the anthropic principles states the laws of nature or the laws of the unverse are in part dependant on our own existence. He then sort of rephrases it in a more accurate And then says it is silly.
I agree it is silly if you belive there are an almost infinite amount of landscapes or universes with different laws such as gravity.
But - in now way did he contradict what I had previously quoted for you. In which he said if math or science goes on to show that his speculation about landscapes is incorrect then physicists would be hard pressed to answer the I.Ders and the anthropic principle.
the origin of man u say? overwhelming evidence points toward the 3rd chimpanzee my son...Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Not knowing something for a fact, but representing as so, is not science...
However, I am open to your factual verification that the origin of man is from ignorant chance.
Fact please, no assumptions that are unverifiable, unfalsifiable, or impossible to logically conclude as not equally possible as ignorant chance.
Your confusion continues, I am not your son.