Intelligent Design is not creationism
- Thread starter Teleologist
- Start date
I don't have a need to prove it or disprove it.
I don't know of anyone who thinks or suggests that Santa Claus is the intelligence behind the origin of mankind...
If you are the only who is suggesting a theory of Santa Claus as the origin of mankind, well, to each their own...
It is not my job to evaluate if the faith of others is true, my issue is the teaching faith based science, i.e. a faith based assumption of ignorant chance as the origin of man in the public schools. I prefer that we don't teach such belief systems at all in science, but if we have to, at the very least teach children an alternate theory of ID so that they may make up their own mind, not be subjected to dogma of scientists, Darwinism, and Atheistic Evolutionism...
Oh, and you are terribly confused if you think I am your "son."
I don't know of anyone who thinks or suggests that Santa Claus is the intelligence behind the origin of mankind...
If you are the only who is suggesting a theory of Santa Claus as the origin of mankind, well, to each their own...
It is not my job to evaluate if the faith of others is true, my issue is the teaching faith based science, i.e. a faith based assumption of ignorant chance as the origin of man in the public schools. I prefer that we don't teach such belief systems at all in science, but if we have to, at the very least teach children an alternate theory of ID so that they may make up their own mind, not be subjected to dogma of scientists, Darwinism, and Atheistic Evolutionism...
Oh, and you are terribly confused if you think I am your "son."
Quote from 2cents:
and your ignorance in that matter should be taken as proof that the theory is invalid???
no offense son, seems to me you simply can't disprove it... and why is that do u think? such a straightforward theory...
i think its a pretty robust alterna tive to evolution, and randomness
You are free to do whatever you want with your faith, please start a thread on your faith.
Otherwise it is simply a red herring...and distracts from the topic of this thread.
Otherwise it is simply a red herring...and distracts from the topic of this thread.
if u teach them the undisprovable Santa Claus theory, that'll take about 20 seconds... then u can explain to them what "falsifiable" actually means and why unfalsifiable theories such as ID are pretty useless for all intents and purposes, and then with all this valuable time left, move on to proper science, randomness etc... just a suggestion my son
My son,
How would you do that? After all, there is not a shred of proof for ID! You couldn't very well put it forward as a theory, could you? Because 'theory' implies evidence.
If I am wrong about there being proof for ID, could you post a link so that I can check it out?
Thanks, Nik
PS
I know, those damn atheists, eh? I mean really, how could they be so blind? Don't they see the miracle of the Creator immanent in every aspect of the natural world?
I have no interest in teaching them your theory, thanks anyway.
My preference is that we teach no faith based science, like is currently being propagated in the public school systems.
Teach science, not faith...
Not knocking your own personal faith in Santa Claus, to each their own.
And your confusion continues, I am not your son...
My preference is that we teach no faith based science, like is currently being propagated in the public school systems.
Teach science, not faith...
Not knocking your own personal faith in Santa Claus, to each their own.
And your confusion continues, I am not your son...
So you are seriously suggesting that Santa Claus is the origin of mankind?
More troll gobbledygook...