I've tested the "let winners run". It doesn't work in daytrading. Swing trading, maybe.
You're screwed on two fronts: having the right entry, and having a runner which happens like 30% or less of the time; all within a limited timeframe.
BY the time you actually catch a runner, you're already suffering steep drawdowns by a thousand cuts.
Well, the strategy finally crapped out. Everything was working as per the trading plan. This strategy will have a big loss and will take months to recover. In the backtests, I've had max +900 days of recovery time. Even though it looked like a steady strategy, mentally that would probably drive me crazy to sit through that. So I'm going to tweak the risk a little bit to figure out how to balance income with the risk:
Loss happened the week of 3/18. So the year down about -25%. Good thing for that max stop loss though..sheesh
View attachment 337163
View attachment 337164
Feb pnl: +$2210
feb return: 4.26%
ndx: 5.29%
spx: 5.10%
YTD return: 9.56%
NDX: 7.24%
SPX: 6.84%
View attachment 335136
View attachment 335137
What caused it to blow up?
Is the blow up a necessary risk to the strategy? (Like you are betting on mean reversion and then it trends against you)
It's inherent in the strategy I guess. Betting on a breakout on ORB but it remains mean reverting.
Orb?
Here is my experience in day trading:Well, you don’t seem to have that problem during your intraday drawdowns which often come at huge multiples of your average daily gain.
In summary, when you’re in drawdown you just keep going and going, but quit as soon as you’re in profit. Equally, you will book the day as soon as you have a green day.
Why not keep going on a green day as well?
Surely there has to be a middle ground here.
In principle, I don’t see anything wrong with daily conservative targets, but the fact that you’re willing to go 10-25x your average daily gain in the red to achieve it sums up the flaws of this approach.

opening range breakout