Incredible 77 Full ES points Call/Prediction in less than 12 hours!

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

You're a fool (OK Ivan, now I'm getting nasty).
I love it how I'm having you make a fool of yourself and jump around desperately just like a Monkey on a hot plate where exactly I had meant to place you!:D
See Moron, how a quant can manipulate your little naive mind?:p
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

I love it how I'm having you make a fool of yourself and jump around desperately just like a Monkey on a hot plate where exactly I had meant to place you!:D
See Moron, how a quant can manipulate your little naive mind?:p
Yes, you're really showing me up on your thread. :eek:

LOL :)
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

I have predicted in the same manor and all fully documented and substantiated more than 1,500 full ES points in the last couple of 2 years!!!!!!!
That only happened in your imagination. :(


Quote from ML_QUANT:

I am not looking for stake and do not need one just this is my way of recording and registering the Predictions as the primary cause and messing with ignorant minds the like of the Mandle. It gives me a huge kick how the loser’s react to other’s success. I have said time and over just 1 tick a day = 2% return a day that not even 1% of all traders can achieve! Now read my first post in this thread and tell me what was wrong with those 6 calls that gained 71 points in less than 12 hours.?!
Your information is not actionable. :eek:

Quote from ML_QUANT:

p.s
congratulations to the junior trader whom maybe junior in experience but I am sure Senor and superior to everyone in this forum in trading.
Including yourself, LOL some more. :D
 
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

Never use stops.

Trades with 1 lot.

OK, I rest my case. :) :p
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

That's not a bad thought, actually.
***
Hopefully neke will just keep hsi focus and maintain his discipline with his trading style.

I know that if I had almsot half a mil in my account, I could effectively retire and have an extraordinary slush fund to trade with.

So no matter how you look at it he's had a great run this year, learned a lot, and I'm sure will up the ante for next year.
Poor Mandel, sad but true...now we know the source for envy and anger...although I could help you but I need you to set aside jealousy and read my posts and ask intelligent questions or I'll rest my case with you:)
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

Poor Mandel, sad but true...now we know the source for envy and anger...
LMAO, doing your due diligence now?

It's pretty obvious that I was complimenting Neke's performance ... unlike how everyone is responding to yours. :p
Quote from ML_QUANT:

...although I could help you but I need you to set aside jealousy and read my posts and ask intelligent questions or I'll rest my case with you:)

Yes, I'm sure your 1 lot trades are just kill'in the market!:eek: :D
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

..I am sure Senor and superior to everyone in this forum in trading.
What moron would make a claim like this? What is it with all these weak shallow losers at ET making predictions? You have to trade not make predictions. You have to make yourself rich not waste your time bragging, boasting and making a big noise all the time. So tedious.
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

Random means unpredictable!!!!! If you can continuously and constantly get 51% then the outcome can be predicted as 51% hence not random anymore????!!!!!

You don't pay me tuition, it is not my job to fill in the holes in your education. I suggest you find a local college and take a 2-3 course sequence in statistics. If you do that, and then you want to chat, I'll happily oblige.

Cheers!
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

Which part of that call is specifically Vague or Ambiguous????

You do not state up front the conditions under which the trade gets closed for a loss. This makes it IMPOSSIBLE to exercise any meaningful risk management. Which makes your "system" useless, as the ability to endure arbitrary "zig zag" requires such enormous de-leveraging that your return on equity is by definition quite horrible.

It also makes your statement about "zero drawdown" extremely disingenuous. Since it appears you don't actually know what you're doing, I will resist calling it "fraudulent".

Hope that clarifies a few things.

Cheers.
 
Back
Top