Incredible 77 Full ES points Call/Prediction in less than 12 hours!

Quote from Now is Now:

Now then , Quant

I am a simple person that simply asks simple questions for the simple reason I need simple answers.

You may be aware that this the third thread you have running and I am getting exhausted trying to follow through on what is happening in this little saga. At the moment , I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, but you are pushing me because you seem to be antagonizing those that have expressed doubts, wherein you really don't need to do that...believe me. You are obviously intelligent ,but not smart doing that.


So...NOW...to the point.

How about a simple answer to my previous question...What were your targets for your 1/12 15 pointer buy 869//885 in the 771 thread? Were there any targets?

What do you anticipate, if you have not already done it, to be the necessary capital requirements to put this in effect? My thought is that you could assume you would use day margin and close/reopen exposures to commence "new day margin" which will lessen the required capital base.

A slightly more complex question...you indicated that you had profitable trades off specific lows (targets)....were they as a result of a new wave or were they "discretionary " trades...?

Which begs the question, if you had targets for the 869/885 buy, did you have reverse trades from those "targets"...in other words, did the same set of rules apply to your buy side as they did to your successful sell side trade?

If there is something that is not clear , please ask and I will oblige.

NiN
More...
NN,
You keep asking about this 869/885 and not in a clear way?
This was a call made when ES was at 869 and the call was that ES will hit 885! Which with the high of yesterday at 879.50 we got very close to hitting it. Hopefully on Mon. Hitting that last call from 771 thread will complete that thread with 100% of all calls having been successfully achieved and targets reached and I’ll then retire that thread.

The capital required must be based on complete margin + room for DD. On the 6 trade calls to 813 we were lucky and the DD has so far been Zero but that is not always the case. I have no exact idea but seems fair to allocate 10k per contract would be more than sufficient. The number of open contracts depend on the signals generated? This could be as many as 10 to say 30 open contracts at any given time hence say you’ll need 200k per instrument all things considered(I averaged between 10 and 30).

I did not say I had trades off of the lows/targets although I did indeed have such trades. What I said was that every Target I have mentioned has also become a substantial support that after hitting them the ES has bounced 15 to 50 points off them which substantiates further the validity of the called Targets and bounces have been sometimes to ½ point of exceeding them!!!!
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

NN,
You keep asking about this 869/885 and not in a clear way?
This was a call made when ES was at 869 and the call was that ES will hit 885! Which with the high of yesterday at 879.50 we got very close to hitting it. Hopefully on Mon. Hitting that last call from 771 thread will complete that thread with 100% of all calls having been successfully achieved and targets reached and I’ll then retire that thread.
More...
Oh, I see how it works.

Pull a call out of your ass, wait around until the number gets hit, and then claim success.

Got it! :p

Quote from ML_QUANT:

The capital required must be based on complete margin + room for DD. On the 6 trade calls to 813 we were lucky and the DD has so far been Zero but that is not always the case. I have no exact idea but seems fair to allocate 10k per contract would be more than sufficient. The number of open contracts depend on the signals generated? This could be as many as 10 to say 30 open contracts at any given time hence say you’ll need 200k per instrument all things considered(I averaged between 10 and 30).
More...
Um .... do you know how to trade? :confused:

Quote from ML_QUANT:

I did not say I had trades off of the lows/targets although I did indeed have such trades. What I said was that every Target I have mentioned has also become a substantial support that after hitting them the ES has bounced 15 to 50 points off them which substantiates further the validity of the called Targets and bounces have been sometimes to ½ point of exceeding them!!!!
More...
Your claims have now bee substantiated (because you said so) ... LMAO. :D
 
Quote from Random.Capital:

Absolutely not. This quote sums up why...



You aren't making calls at all - you're setting up vague situations where you get to declare yourself "right" regardless of what happens. And that's ignoring the "simulated" issue, which is just enormous in and of itself.

This fails the Popper test and is therefore useless, and quite possibly damaging.
More...
Be specific about the 6 trade list call that 5 of it's targets have already been hit and reached in I don't know less than 24 hours?! Which part of that call is specifically Vague or Ambiguous????

Which Si,m are you talking about? When did I ever say Sim except as a Disclaimer other than this Cu~t throwing around the rumor to mislead people like yourself????!
In fact if you read my posts I have been very clear about NEVER using Stops nor Simulators and always back test at great cost with Real Money to feel the impact but I do back test mostly with 1 lot average to normally 3!
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

In fact if you read my posts I have been very clear about NEVER using Stops nor Simulators and always back test at great cost with Real Money to feel the impact but I do back test mostly with 1 lot average to normally 3!
More...
Never use stops.

Trades with 1 lot.

OK, I rest my case. :) :p
 
The junior trader in my office earned 4000% on account in 2008. This is documented and he's sure to earn more than all but the bank's Chairman.

I realize this has nothing to do with a few index calls made by the author, but then, what is the point of this thread? I fail to see the relevance. Were all of these calls time-stamped with specific entries, targets and stop-losses?

Are you looking for a stake? If so, this thread will not serve that purpose.
 
Quote from Random.Capital:

That is as idiotic a statement as has ever been made on ET.
More...
Reasons and specific substantiations in place of a simple quote that no one could benefit from if you will?
Random means unpredictable!!!!! If you can continuously and constantly get 51% then the outcome can be predicted as 51% hence not random anymore????!!!!!
 
Quote from ML_QUANT:

Reasons and specific substantiations in place of a simple quote that no one could benefit from if you will?
Random means unpredictable!!!!! If you can continuously and constantly get 51% then the outcome can be predicted as 51% hence not random anymore????!!!!!
More...
You're a fool (OK Ivan, now I'm getting nasty).
 
Quote from pinthestrike:

The junior trader in my office earned 4000% on account in 2008. This is documented and he's sure to earn more than all but the bank's Chairman.

I realize this has nothing to do with a few index calls made by the author, but then, what is the point of this thread? I fail to see the relevance. We're all of these calls time-stamped with specific entries, targets and stop-losses?

Are you looking for a stake? If so, this thread will not serve that purpose.
More...
I have predicted in the same manor and all fully documented and substantiated more than 1,500 full ES points in the last couple of 2 years!!!!!!!
I am not looking for stake and do not need one just this is my way of recording and registering the Predictions as the primary cause and messing with ignorant minds the like of the Mandle. It gives me a huge kick how the loser’s react to other’s success. I have said time and over just 1 tick a day = 2% return a day that not even 1% of all traders can achieve! Now read my first post in this thread and tell me what was wrong with those 6 calls that gained 71 points in less than 12 hours.?!
p.s
congratulations to the junior trader whom maybe junior in experience but I am sure Senor and superior to everyone in this forum in trading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top