Increases in CO2 - Causes Cooling

[jem]

we seem to be at the very low end of the historical record.
co2 is the black line.

 

[jem]

here is a new study... that contradicts one the main tenants of nutter theory.
don't go blaming watts... he is just summarizing the new study published in a agw nutter respected journal...


BOMBSHELL: Study shows greenhouse gas induced warming dropped for the past 14 years
Posted on August 5, 2014 by Anthony Watts
Paper finds a decrease of IR radiation from greenhouse gases over past 14 years, contradicts expected increase – cloudiness blamed for difference.

A paper published in the Journal of Climate finds from 800,000 observations a significant decrease in longwave infrared radiation from increasing greenhouse gases over the 14 year period 1996-2010 in the US Great Plains. CO2 levels increased ~7% over this period and according to AGW theory, downwelling IR should have instead increased over this period.
According to the authors,

“The AERI data record demonstrates that the downwelling infrared radiance is decreasing over this 14-yr period in the winter, summer, and autumn seasons but it is increasing in the spring; these trends are statistically significant and are primarily due to long-term change in the cloudiness above the site.”

The findings contradict the main tenet of AGW theory which states increasing greenhouse gases including the primary greenhouse gas water vapor and clouds will cause an increase of downwelling longwave infrared “back-radiation.”



The paper also finds a negative trend in precipitable water vapor, as do other global datasets, again the opposite of predictions of AGW theory that warming allegedly from CO2 will increase precipitable water vapor in the atmosphere to allegedly amplify warming by 3-5 times. Is the unexpected decrease in water vapor the cause of the decrease in downwelling IR?



Global datasets also show an increase of outgoing longwave IR radiation to space from greenhouse gases over the past 62 years, again in contradiction to the predictions of AGW theory.
Gero, P. Jonathan, David D. Turner, 2011: Long-Term Trends in Downwelling Spectral Infrared Radiance over the U.S. Southern Great Plains. J. Climate, 24, 4831–4843.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4210.1

 

[convexx]

we seem to be at the very low end of the historical record.
co2 is the black line.

You're fucking retarded. The drop in CO2 was coincident to afforestation in the Paleozoic. Basically, there were no plants... then there were. Hence the drop in CO2.

 

[jem]

I have no idea what the hell you are trying to say. You come here and act like you know something about the subject. I posted that chart to show we are at low co2 levels. Nothing about your response changes that fact. In short your response was a classic non sequitor.

So spit it out. Connect the dots. What about your info... shows that man made co2 causes warming?

You're fucking retarded. The drop in CO2 was coincident to afforestation in the Paleozoic. Basically, there were no plants... then there were. Hence the drop in CO2.

 

[convexx]

I have no idea what the hell you are trying to say. You come here and act like you know something about the subject. I posted that chart to show we are at low co2 levels. Nothing about your response changes that fact. In short your response was a classic non sequitor.

So spit it out. Connect the dots. What about your info... shows that man made co2 causes warming?

Backpedal faster. The Earth was basically a rock, few terrestrial plants... then there was a lot of them... wtf do you think happened to the CO2, you moron? You really are this ignorant.

CO2 was scale-high prior to terrestrial plants.. and amazingly the drop in CO2 during the Paleozoic occurs with afforestation.

Here, numbnuts. It's short.

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/paleozoic/paleozoiclife.html

Fucking WOW.

 

[jem]

backpedal?

here is the quote... to which your googles add or subtract nothing.

we seem to be at the very low end of the historical record.
co2 is the black line.

 

[convexx]

backpedal?

here is the quote... to which your googles add or subtract nothing.

lol you're comparing a period with no plant life to the current state of the planet. Which means either you were dropped on your head or somehow missed the fact that terrestrial afforestation BEGAN during the Paleozoic (Silurian).

I would laugh, but I weep for your children.

 

[jem]

but you just said this a minute ago.

You're fucking retarded. The drop in CO2 was coincident to afforestation in the Paleozoic. Basically, there were no plants... then there were. Hence the drop in CO2.

 

[jem]

so your argument is what --- coincident with the drop... or no plant life at all.

lol you're comparing a period with no plant life to the current state of the planet. Which means either you were dropped on your head or somehow missed the fact that terrestrial afforestation BEGAN during the Paleozoic (Silurian).

I would laugh, but I weep for your children.

 

[convexx]

Bro.

You show we're at the bottom scale of the "historical record" but fail to see the forest for the trees. OBVIOUSLY CO2 was highest prior to afforestation.

You're so abjectly stupid that I am surprised you haven't choked yourself.