In the Coronavirus Fight in Scandinavia, Sweden Stands Apart

[Tsing Tao]

The data in chart is bullshiat as noted below (once again).

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths
(fips is federal county code)

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases (or per million) for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases (or cases per million possibly)-- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase in cases between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off. I will note the data source does not provide cases per million so obviously the chart is not drawn directly from the claimed source.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.

Wait, what? What is your question here?

You're saying that the chart does not match the data? Is that what you are saying? I just want to make sure I understand what you are contesting.

By the way, it is good you finally went to contesting the actual data. This is something we can discuss.

 

[gwb-trading]

Wait, what? What is your question here?

You're saying that the chart does not match the data? Is that what you are saying? I just want to make sure I understand what you are contesting.

By the way, it is good you finally went to contesting the actual data. This is something we can discuss.

Obviously -- once again -- the chart is crap and does not match the claimed data source. Let's go through it once again.

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths
(fips is federal county code)

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases (or per million) for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases (or cases per million possibly)-- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase in cases between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off. I will note the data source does not provide cases per million so obviously the chart is not drawn directly from the claimed source.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.

How come you keep pimping and promoting crap from bullshiat data sources? Aren't tired of being called out on the continuous stream of crap you post without attribution or a link to the url.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Obviously -- once again -- the chart is crap and does not match the claimed data source. Let's go through it once again.

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths
(fips is federal county code)

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases (or per million) for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases (or cases per million possibly)-- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase in cases between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off. I will note the data source does not provide cases per million so obviously the chart is not drawn directly from the claimed source.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.

How come you keep pimping and promoting crap from bullshiat data sources? Aren't tired of being called out on the continuous stream for crap you post without attribution or a link to the url.

You really can't answer a simple question, can you? This is what makes me instantly suspicious of your intent - and your cut and paste spam without actually being specific.

So, you claim that Jan 17, 2021 data in the chart is not 540.

The data says 375, and the chart shows 375, - at least as best as one can estimate that date on the chart at that exact line. Looks just fine to me.

So what's your beef? That you can't fling shit on the person who made the chart like the monkey you are?

 

[gwb-trading]

BTW -- I found the source for your chart. It is from anti-mask, COVID-denier Tweeter @ianmSC -- who pushes constant COVID fabrications attacking Fauci & everyone else who outlines the actual science. Plus continual support for Scott Atlas and other idiots.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1362213305037647873

 

[gwb-trading]

You really can't answer a simple question, can you? This is what makes me instantly suspicious of your intent - and your cut and paste spam without actually being specific.

So, you claim that Jan 17, 2021 data in the chart is not 540.

The data says 375, and the chart shows 375,

So what's your beef?

The chart shows about 540 for January 17, 2021 -- not 375.

Go read the chart. You are pushing crap again and can't even read the chart you promoted.

At this point you are being deliberately thick.

 

[Tsing Tao]

The chart shows about 540 for January 17, 2021 -- not 375.

Go read the chart. You are pushing crap again and can't even read the chart you promoted.

At this point you are being deliberately thick.

Please show me how you can tell which line is exactly that date on the chart.

 

[Tsing Tao]

BTW -- I found the source for your chart. It is from anti-mask, COVID-denier Tweeter @ianmSC -- who pushes constant COVID fabrications attacking Fauci & everyone else who outlines the actual science. Plus continual support for Scott Atlas and other idiots.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1362213305037647873

Two things are funny about this:

1. The amount of time you must have put forth to find the person who created the chart (no wonder it got quiet for an hour or so around here).
2. The fact that you still can't debate the chart itself, but just attack the person instead.

 

[gwb-trading]

Please show me how you can tell which line is exactly that date on the chart.

Are you trying to claim the value around February 17, 2021 is near 375. Obviously the value is above 500.

Line drawn as reference for approx. location

 

[gwb-trading]

Two things are funny about this:

1. The amount of time you must have put forth to find the person who created the chart (no wonder it got quiet for an hour or so around here).
2. The fact that you still can't debate the chart itself, but just attack the person instead.

If all the other information and charts this Twitter user pushed are complete crap..... then it is likely this chart is also complete crap. Integrity of your sources matter.

Why don't you stop posting fabricated nonsense from blogger and tweeters without attribution --- and use mainsteam sources with attribution. At that point we can debate the facts rather than have a discussion over the false nonsense you are promoting as "factual". You flinging the latest bullshiat over and over again without attribution is getting old.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Are you trying to claim the value around February 17, 2021 is near 375. Obviously the value is above 500.

View attachment 252988

Line drawn as reference for approx. location

I downloaded the CSV and pulled out sections of it from the collier County Florida data.

Here is the period:

Now, I will concede that the chart does not seem to match this data set as presented. But the weird thing is that the data doesn't seem to make sense either. Are we supposed to believe deaths were 386 people on 1/21, 1/22 and 1/23 AND 1/24 ? That's a hell of a coincidence.

I'm guessing this is incremental cases or something. Ideas? I mean other than your "kill all the people who disagree!" mania.