In the Coronavirus Fight in Scandinavia, Sweden Stands Apart

gwb-trading said:
Stop pushing nonsense --- the source of your image is https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EueNxK5VkAEvfg7?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

The url of the image your posted is from pbs.twimg.com - pbs.twimg.com subdomain is Twitter's image-hosting domain --- So obviously this chart came from some bullshiat Tweet from a clown.

Which demonstrates once again why your are unwilling to provide the source -- you know it is a crap source.
More...

You continue to want to find the person who posted the chart when all the data is perfectly available to refute. This proves my case that you can't refute the data, and only want to discredit the source.

I could easily provide the source, but it is irrelevant. You can't dispute the data.

Just because you don't know who posted the chart doesn't make the information inaccurate.

You're a fraud, GWB. And now its more evident than ever.
 
Fun conversation with GWB:

Me: "The Gravitational Constant on Mars is 3.711 m/s squared."

GWB: "Who says this?"

Me: The internet

GWB: But who is the source?

Me: Doesn't matter.

GWB: you don't want to show the source because you know the data is from a bullshit source.

Me: The data is correct. What about it is wrong

GWB: The fact that you won't share the source means the data is wrong.

hahaha....
 
Tsing Tao said:
You continue to want to find the person who posted the chart when all the data is perfectly available to refute. This proves my case that you can't refute the data, and only want to discredit the source.

I could easily provide the source, but it is irrelevant. You can't dispute the data.

Just because you don't know who posted the chart doesn't make the information inaccurate.

You're a fraud, GWB. And now its more evident than ever.
More...

Provide the Tweet you got the chart from or just hush up.

Once again you are posting crap charts from Tweeters without attribution.
 
Tsing Tao said:
You continue to want to find the person who posted the chart when all the data is perfectly available to refute. This proves my case that you can't refute the data, and only want to discredit the source.

I could easily provide the source, but it is irrelevant. You can't dispute the data.

Just because you don't know who posted the chart doesn't make the information inaccurate.

You're a fraud, GWB. And now its more evident than ever.
More...

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases -- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.
 
Last edited:
gwb-trading said:
Provide the Tweet you got the chart from or just hush up.

Once again you are posting crap charts from Tweeters without attribution.
More...
You just don’t like the data. Source provided then means it’s wrong or misinterpreted or the writer was an ‘anti masker’.
You don’t like the science and so you seek that which supports your fear porn narrative.

Like when you said R0 of COVID is 4.5 and then provided no data behind that.
It’s not. And anyone who says it is can easily be disputed.
 
LacesOut said:
You just don’t like the data. Source provided then means it’s wrong or misinterpreted or the writer was an ‘anti masker’.
You don’t like the science and so you seek that which supports your fear porn narrative.

Like when you said R0 of COVID is 4.5 and then provided no data behind that.
It’s not. And anyone who says it is can easily be disputed.
More...

See the post two above --- the chart from some Tweeter user does not represent the claimed data source. Hence the chart is crap.
 
gwb-trading said:
Provide the Tweet you got the chart from or just hush up.

Once again you are posting crap charts from Tweeters without attribution.
More...

I don't think I'll provide the tweet to you OR hush up. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

If you can't refute the data presented (and the source data linked) then you're the yambag.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I don't think I'll provide the tweet to you OR hush up. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

If you can't refute the data presented (and the source data linked) then you're the yambag.
More...

The data in chart is bullshiat as noted below (once again).

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths
(fips is federal county code)

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases (or per million) for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases (or cases per million possibly)-- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase in cases between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off. I will note the data source does not provide cases per million so obviously the chart is not drawn directly from the claimed source.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.
 
LacesOut said:
You just don’t like the data. Source provided then means it’s wrong or misinterpreted or the writer was an ‘anti masker’.
You don’t like the science and so you seek that which supports your fear porn narrative.

Like when you said R0 of COVID is 4.5 and then provided no data behind that.
It’s not. And anyone who says it is can easily be disputed.
More...

EXACTLY.

Anyone providing me data that I disagreed with, I'd go right to the data. I wouldn't ask a fucking stupid question like "How did you come by this data??"

What matters is the data, not where the data came from IF it is verifiable through a number of sources publically.
 
Tsing Tao said:
EXACTLY.

Anyone providing me data that I disagreed with, I'd go right to the data. I wouldn't ask a fucking stupid question like "How did you come by this data??"

What matters is the data, not where the data came from IF it is verifiable through a number of sources publically.
More...

The data in the chart is crap and not verifiable from ANY source. Let's walk through it again.

So the data at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/blob/master/us-counties.csv
provides data in the following format:
date,county,state,fips,cases,deaths
(fips is federal county code)

Lets take a look at the data for Collier County, FL on January 17, 2021
2021-01-17,Collier,Florida,12021,25782,376

Based on this data tell us how the chart comes up with approximately 540 cases (or per million) for January 17, 2021. (Hint it is not a delta from January 16, 2021 for total cases.
2021-01-16,Collier,Florida,12021,25645,375

Obviously the chart shows a 540 cases (or cases per million possibly)-- a delta from the data source showing 137 case increase in cases between the two days in Collier County, FL. So much for cases --- nor does it align with cases per million based on county population of approximately 384,902 people (2019 data).

Whether you look at cases or cases per million -- the chart is off. I will note the data source does not provide cases per million so obviously the chart is not drawn directly from the claimed source.

This basically demonstrates the chart is not drawn from the data source -- hence the chart is complete crap.

Of course, you are unwilling to provide the Tweet which is the source of the chart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top