you don't know that any policy as failed.
you are measuring what? is economic impact in your measurement. domestic violence, depression, alcoholism what?
even if its soley deaths... you will have to wait for a while before you know.
Delaying deaths may not delay the total deaths.
finally, don't you think we need to be comparing at risk vs at risk in the percentages.
if sweden has a higher percentage of at risk people what exactly do you know?
for instance are you prepared to say New York had the worst response and the worst Governor?
you are measuring what? is economic impact in your measurement. domestic violence, depression, alcoholism what?
even if its soley deaths... you will have to wait for a while before you know.
Delaying deaths may not delay the total deaths.
finally, don't you think we need to be comparing at risk vs at risk in the percentages.
if sweden has a higher percentage of at risk people what exactly do you know?
for instance are you prepared to say New York had the worst response and the worst Governor?
The raw figures from Sweden do not support the health minister's assertions. Unless he provides the "claimed" models supporting his herd immunity assertions then he is merely spouting propaganda from the government line trying to defend their failed and dangerous policy.