Again, you're stuck on the false premise that interpretation of these comments or events are binary. I'll do a simple example.
Trump says "Proud boys? Fine, proud boys stand back, stand by."
A. Your interpretation: Trump supports proud boys, and because proud boys are a white supremacist group, he is also a white supremacist.
B. My interpretation: After listening to context, Trump asked "who do you want me to denounce?" Biden calls out "proud boys". Trump, flustered mentions them by name with a poorly worded "stand down" comment, but this does not mean he is a white supremacist.
C. A person here you consider to be unsavory interprets this as: Trump says all liberals are idiots and Proud Boys are not white supremacist.
Your view is clearly at odds with B & C. My view is at odds with A and C. I don't think Trump meant either A or C.
You assume that because I don't agree with A, I must agree with C.
Now, I don't expect you to admit to this flaw of logic, but that's how I see it here. Happy to discuss.