Impeachment 2.0

[Buy1Sell2]

imagine the judge, who was also a victim of the alleged crime, and who has already stated that they would vote to convict, meeting and voting w/the jurors in any other trial?

 

[Buy1Sell2]

You saw probably photoshopped pictures, just like with the inauguration of Trump in 2016.

View attachment 251748

Photos shown by the media of Trump's inauguration were all taken hours before the event in the early morning. Here is a picture of Trump's inauguration crowd taken during the event.

 

[userque]

Photos shown by the media of Trump's inauguration were all taken hours before the event in the early morning. Here is a picture of Trump's inauguration crowd taken during the event.
View attachment 251765

LMAO

Readers, please do a reverse google search on that image.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Looks pretty full to me ----and this photo can certainly be trusted time-wise as Trump is standing there.

 

[virtusa]

This is what Mc Connell said, the most important Republican:

Mc Connell confirms ALL claims made by the Democrats.

 

[virtusa]

Looks pretty full to me ----and this photo can certainly be trusted time-wise as Trump is standing there.


View attachment 251766

That photo was perfectly modified. Fake, -just as all other claims from Trump.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

That photo was perfectly modified. Fake, -just as all other claims from Trump.

Trump out of office nearly a month and he still lives rent free in Idiot Dem minds.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Constitutional scholars sided with Raskin. Trump’s coterie of ambulance chasers, not so much.

Every case that comes before the Supreme Court has "constitutional scholars" on each side of the issues. It goes with the turf.

The case is moot and settled now. The defendant was acquitted.

Your constitutional scholars are free to go off and continue to be right about anything they want but they are all dressed up with no court to take it to.

giggle.

 

[El OchoCinco]

The "jury" was going to vote by party line mainly so before the trial even started it was irrelevant what arguments were made or who was on what side of the arguments or what evidence was going to be brought it.

Trump's attorneys actually could have gotten up and rested immediately after the House Managers finished and still won this case.

 

[Cuddles]

The "jury" was going to vote by party line mainly so before the trial even started it was irrelevant what arguments were made or who was on what side of the arguments or what evidence was going to be brought it.

Trump's attorneys actually could have gotten up and rested immediately after the House Managers finished and still won this case.

But I was told this was the party of law and order Ocho? The party that claims there's no privilege under the law?