IMAM: I Warned DeBlasio About NYC Terror; He Was Too Busy Bashing Trump
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
I don't really care to blame Obama or Bush or Clinton or Trump in the future.
How about we just end immigration until we can screen out terrorists.
by the way doing so will be good for pay and global warming concerns... (much smaller carbon footprints.)
immigration is really bad for global warming.
How about we just end immigration until we can screen out terrorists.
by the way doing so will be good for pay and global warming concerns... (much smaller carbon footprints.)
immigration is really bad for global warming.
Jem, hadn't that guy been in the country for like ten years? Including 9/11, how do the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack in this country compare with the chances of being struck by lightning? Does anyone know?
http://time.com/5006353/why-we-shouldnt-exaggerate-the-scale-of-terrorism/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...killed-by-a-terrorist/?utm_term=.88cfdf974c83
Last edited:
I have noted many times through personal discussions with libtards that they believe in deeper vetting but if you cannot construct a positive background on the person or no nothing about him/her because their hometown looks like a bombed out parking garage, then they believe that that person should be allowed to enter the country. In other words, the default is that they have a right to come here in the absence of a negative criminal or combatant history.
GREAT BIG FRIGGING NO TO THAT. There are millions of people who are probably very nice people but who have no records whatsoever, either positive or negative. They should not be allowed into the country. We should work with the UN and others to create safe zones and refugee camps closer to their home country but the default is not that they are good to go. There are hundreds of thousands of ISIS now who have been dislocated due to recent military action. Trust me, they do not have a record. But if a record did exist, it would not be pretty.
No and no again.
Okay, at least there is some reasoning here. Is this opinion supportable with any real observations or statistics? That could really strengthen your argument.
You'll be singing a different tune if it was your Parents,wife and Kids.
Again,take notice ..these liberals have shown no sympathy for the victims. Now they are rationalizing terrorist attacks with odds.
Also take notice,they never did this with Las Vegas .
They are not rational people.
After Vegas: Liberals blamed guns AND white males. After Manhattan: Liberals did NOT blame trucks OR Muslims. Selective outrage?
LOL, always funny to see Trumpers talking about liars.
The most pathological liar known to man, how is that tax returns after audit coming? Mexico paying for the wall? I can't even count. I bet you believe that he didn't rape a 13 year old either? At least Monica was an adult and it was consensual. Try not to go that route, I got lot more to say.
As for your Sudanese BS, US had no authority to take him in custody, when he was indicted, Clinton tried to kill him which was what I was responding to. Funny, you didn't respond to that lie that was peddled by your fellow Con.