Imagine a terrorist attack now

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Very well, since you asked: First you said sophisticated and cultured gentlemen and ladies would never drink a beverage from a can, even in an emergency situation.

Provide a link to exact quote you are making claim to.

Later you said the truly sophisticated would retain their status if they were to lower themselves and drink a beverage from a can.

Yes, they retain their status even if they have to slum it for some reason...

The contradiction is that you say they would never do such a thing (drink from a can), and later state that if they were to do so (slumming it, you said), they would still retain their high status.

No contradiction. Most folks say "I would never do ________, which means they would never want to do _______, but an emergency unique situation might force them temporarily to act against their will or better judgment.

Now, do you really want me to start giving hypothetical situations where people are forced to make a choice between deeply conflicting acts?

Therefore, the issue of their retaining their status is moot as they would never lower themselves to drink from a can to begin with, right?

Retaining their status is not moot at all, it is reality of their status to be above sullying because of some unique situation that requires slumming it...
Your response is radically inefficient and I do not expect improvement, so best to leave it at that.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Proper carries no moral judgment.
It does by defininition.

Anyhow, it's hilarious that you used a fishing metaphor. I set the hook in you so easily today. You seem to post differently as O777. Not quite as clean in your trolling efforts.
 
Proper procedure carries no moral definition in a scientific or clinical setting.

Strictly accurate or correct is what proper means, which is the way in which the word proper was introduced in this thread, has a clinical not moral nature.

Only a deeply confused moralist would tell someone that the mathematical formula they followed was not morally proper...

In any case you seem to be the same old nik, can't even spell definition...

Now, you have my blessing to degrade this thing as much as you like, as that seems to be the knee jerk reaction of your choice.

You can now go into your "he is so disgusting" and "I schooled him" routine...




Quote from traderNik:

It does by defininition.

Anyhow, it's hilarious that you used a fishing metaphor. I set the hook in you so easily today. You seem to post differently as O777. Not quite as clean in your trolling efforts.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Bail whenever you like, mox nix...
Please do not try to bait me.

I said best to leave it at that, so please leave it at that.
 
I am not trying to bait you, whatever you want to do, bug out whenever you like...mox nix.

Good bye.

Quote from hapaboy:

Please do not try to bait me.

I said best to leave it at that, so please leave it at that.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I am not trying to bait you, whatever you want to do...mox nix.
You have failed to explain the contradiction, for whatever reason, so please drop it.
 
You have failed to understand that there was no contradiction, so please drop it.

Quote from hapaboy:

You have failed to explain the contradiction, for whatever reason, so please drop it.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

You have failed to understand that there was no contradiction, so please drop it.
You fail to recognize the contradiction yet alone explain it.

Your bail out is noted.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Proper procedure carries no moral definition in a scientific or clinical setting.
The truth is exactly the opposite. Proper implies rank. You think that you're better than those who you feel aren't as 'well bred' as you. Ironic, since your breeding is fairly mundane.

I find it interesting that after 2 years of avoiding me (as a result of getting your head handed to you on a silver platter while trying to debate me) you've suddenly started responding to my posts. I have a fairly good idea about why this is happening.

: )
 
Back
Top