Illinois set to pass Forced Confiscation of All Semiautos

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BWUwq9oXeNM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Obama: I will not take your guns.

Only because the Constitution and the Supreme Court won't let him.

Myself, I'm going to cling to my guns and my religion. :D
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

If she chooses to live with a felon or has the misfortune to have someone in her household classified as mentally ill, then yes. I am ok with it. If she needs protection, then she should save her money and spend it on a nice security system, dog and taser.

Or limit her to a shotgun.

Wow, I am very surprised. I actually feel the same way, I just did not expect you to be in the same camp.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

I'd like to know if any of the gun enthusiasts here would agree to a ban on high capacity magazines.

Here's the thing. Let's say the killer has a 10 round magazine rather than a 30. Let's take Sandy Hook as an example. Each kid had 10+ rounds in them. You cut down magazine capacity and they have what? 2-3 rounds in them? They're just as dead. It's an illusion that limited magazine capacity will limit the number killed in a high body count massacre.
Personally I don't think it's the end of the world if magazines have a more limited capacity, but don't expect the body count to go down.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

I'd like to know if any of the gun enthusiasts here would agree to a ban on high capacity magazines.

No. First, it won't do anything you're looking for it to do. It takes no time to switch out a 10 clip mag to another (as was demonstrated in a video posted on this forum recently). Second, there are so many of them already out there, so it'll be ineffective. All you'll do is raise the price on them.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

I'd like to know if any of the gun enthusiasts here would agree to a ban on high capacity magazines.

As long as you agree to a ban on high-capacity-gang, home invasions.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

No. First, it won't do anything you're looking for it to do. It takes no time to switch out a 10 clip mag to another (as was demonstrated in a video posted on this forum recently). Second, there are so many of them already out there, so it'll be ineffective. All you'll do is raise the price on them.


Well then maybe we need to ban external magazines altogether. An internal magazine of five should be plenty for hunting. Handguns should also be banned. No good reason for them. A shotgun is perfectly adequate for home defense. The close-quarter argument is a feeble one at best.
 
Back
Top