I will concede, seems like the overall nationwide average breaks up to 45% local, 45% state & 10% federal.
http://www.npr.org/2016/04/18/474256366/why-americas-schools-have-a-money-problem
Still, the aforementioned math does not account for the property taxes.
On full disclosure, my pie charts were based on hypothetical numbers of implementing DAPA & extended DACA (died at SCOTUS) along w/existing DACA. I still don't get the logic of not wanting to make them tax contributors.
Either way Peils numbers were accurate, your claim is that illegals add 200 billion to the economy, the average cost per person in the education system is 10k per year, so if there is 1.76 million people under DACA times it by 10k,(average cost per year per student) which would be 17.6 billion, then times it by ten years (since most kids go to school for atleast ten years.) The numbers Peil has are spot on, frankly you would have to be delusional to think people who are a net drain on the system somehow add to the economy.
Sweden is currently witnessing this problem where roughly half of all refugees are on welfare, but supposedly it grows the economy, please tell me where that growth comes from? Tax payers are paying for it, either through inflation, or debt, you cant bring in people who cost the system more than they pay into it, and claim you are "growing" the economy in real dollars.
Sadly the government in all of the western countries have written cheques they cant possibly cash, the only way to pay for that if by deflating the value of the dollar, and running up debt, so they lie and say people who add no "NET VALUE" to the economy are necessary, because its a gigantic ponzi scheme that requires more and more people paying for less and less benefits in order to survive. Its a slow bleed.
It would be like if a bunch of "Serfs" were working some farmland, and suddenly someone with no arms or legs showed up from another place to live on that farm land, at the end of the day would there be more food based on the labor of the armless legless serf who just showed up there? Or would they simply have to split the food they already produced, with yet another person? There is no such thing as a "free lunch"
If someoene doesnt produce atleast the same amount they take out, they are a net drain on the system. On what balance sheet, and under what kind of fucked up mathematics could you claim the opposite?
In the simplest terms, money represents a unit of labor, printing more money, does not mean there is more production, someone in society has to make up for it, see the broken window fallacy, and why keynesian economics is a joke.
If you come to this country and pay 300 dollars a year in taxes and take out 10k per year in benefits, someone has to pay the bill, there is no free lunch. Who do you think should pay that bill? Also how many people do you think we can afford to just keep coming in for free, or even worse at a -9700$ cost? Should we just let every single person who wants to come here get in with no questions asked? How long do you think that would last before we are broke?
If illegal immigrants and refugees truly grow the economy why dont we just let the whole world in, according to that logic, we would see an economic boom the likes of which we have never seen. Taking in 3 billion third world immigrants should shoot the dow to 20 bazillion according to liberals, so why not just open the doors for everyone?
