Quote from TrendSailor:
Hmm, not that I don't admire your patriotism and glee in this matter but I don't follow the logic. I think in the short term a war would do the opposite. Oil prices would skyrocket as our military drew down the strategic oil reserve to fuel the military effort. Iran would of course mine the Straits of Hormuz and sink tankers in any way it could. Oil would temporarily become much more scarce and prices would shoot way up and probably be rationed.
Frankly I support high oil prices and getting out of a dependent relationship with lunatic oil countries. It seems that oil creates mental diseases as most large oil producing countries seem to be lunatics and have madmen running them. But I digress. If oil is kept high in price OPEC is totally dis-empowered and alternatives ALL become cost competitive and 80% of the energy money stays here in the US and North American (Canadians) and helps western interests and creates large number of new jobs. Coal gasification, nuclear, natural gas etc. all become very very viable with oil at the $80 barrel mark. The problem in the past is that once the US tried to migrate away from oil OPEC would ramp up production to drive prices down so investors would pull out of the US change in energy in-dependency and stall the efforts. Now that OPEC can NOT keep up with production do to high demand they are completely dis-empowered and economically doomed to irrelevance. They don't have enough capacity to fund their own industrial revolutions and the US has succeeded in preventing them from ever economically surpassing our economic capacity. No other nation on the planet has as much cheap oil captured and invested in its infrastructure as the US does. Think if the millions of miles of interstates, buildings, and infrastructure at large that was built with cheap oil since WWII. No other country, not even China using lax environmental laws can approximate the low cost investment of cheap oil that the US has intrinsic to its economy. Our early investments in cheap oil will guarantee or long term economic stability over our competitors since the cost to get to our level of expansion is now too high. We just now need to transition off oil and fast.
As for Libya - we should leave them alone as they are one of the HUGE success stories of west/Arab cooperation. After US government put a chunk of US steel in Gaddafi's butt decades ago to stop his terrorist campaign he finally learned his lesson and is now very moderate and reasonable with the US. He is not perfect mind you - but this is a changed man who is no longer hostile to the west and sees the advantages of being more moderate. The USA's only real core enemy anymore is N. Korea, Syria, Iran and Venezuela. To a lessor degree we need to watch China and Russia (Putin is sneaking around and up to no good in Europe and ex-Soviet states).
Iran is winnable if we play moderate Arabs against them and we go in with a Balkanization strategy to carve up the place through a combination of economic pressure and military containment. Frankly, if it were my call I'd call Iran's bluff and destroy every oil well they own in 24 hours with cruise missiles to deny them an oil weapon at the very next time they sideways threatened anyone again (Europe, Israel or the US). We don't need to invade to take out the current lunatics running the place - just deny them oil revenues so they can't pay off the mullahs and the factions with oil money. The Revolutionary Guard would eventually turn against the gov with no salary/pay and then hopefully side with the students/intellectuals and people to form a more moderate gov. Frankly I am expecting somone internal to Iran to assassinate the nut-job Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and upper clerics Ali Khamenei to be eventually arrested like his predecessor and silenced. What few remain of the unexecuted intellectuals and students will eventually demand changes. It will all depend on how fanatical the Revolutionary Guard are and what general has the most sway.
TS