If people with firearms could end attacks so quickly, why are so many cops shot and killed each year

[exGOPer]

I normally don't answer personal questions. But since you're so deranged and socially isolated that you're compelled to obsessively post about our politics from your country, I'll take pity on you and make an exception. I found this forum by googling something related to politics and was highly amused by the TDS and liberal lunacy. So I'm here to laugh at and mock you and your ilk, when I take breaks from the experiments in my laboratory.

Part of the 6%, hurting small animals for no reason (just like the Trump supporting child killer used to do) doesn't count as experiments by the way.

http://metro.co.uk/2018/02/15/flori...tagram-filled-guns-dead-animal-posts-7313919/

 

[Poindexter]

So in the end, many children will have to die at the hands of Trump supporters, then so be it, what can be done now. Meanwhile, do your bidding for the killers, if only schools were renamed as uterus you Cons would have given more shit about children dying.

You're too deranged and uninformed for this conversation and, unlike you, posting on the internet is not my life's work so I'll just slap down the last part of your rant.

Yeah let's talk about the children. Between 1970 and 2014, there were almost 44.5 million legal abortions according to the CDC. With well over half a million/year after that. Which means that on the day 17 students lost there lives, there were about 100 X as many abortions. Sorry but I don't listen to gun control lectures from hypocrites who think mass murdering babies is OK.

 

[Slartibartfast]

I normally don't answer personal questions. But since you're so deranged and socially isolated that you're compelled to obsessively post about our politics from your country, I'll take pity on you and make an exception. I found this forum by googling something related to politics and was highly amused by the TDS and liberal lunacy. So I'm here to laugh at and mock you and your ilk, when I take breaks from the experiments in my laboratory.

"I found this forum by googling something related to politics and was highly amused by the TDS and liberal lunacy. "

You know, I'd take simple proof of a funded account to filter out the chaff like Poindexter. They contribute NOTHING and will just do as they are told by the NRA when the adults tackle Wayne & Co. plus the gun manufacturers.

Comrade Poindexter, I'm just studying you. Also it is handy to have some make-work to do while in a trade.

 

[gwb-trading]

Part of the 6%, hurting small animals for no reason (just like the Trump supporting child killer used to do) doesn't count as experiments by the way.

http://metro.co.uk/2018/02/15/flori...tagram-filled-guns-dead-animal-posts-7313919/

Interesting meme driven by a Pew poll fabrication... unfortunately it has no place in reality of the political leanings of scientists and engineers -- who by nature are very data, math, statistic and fact driven.

The politics of engineers
http://www.machinedesign.com/news/politics-engineers

Engineers tend to view themselves as much less liberal and slightly more conservative than the general public, according to a recent survey of over 1,200 readers of MACHINE DESIGN and Electronic Design magazines. The same survey also found that engineers say they are more likely to be Republican (42.1%) or Independent (33.7%) voters, as opposed to Democrats (14.5%). And although over a third of the engineers think Republicans represent the best interests of the engineering community better than Democrats, a majority of engineers (48.1%) believe neither party is really on the side of engineers.

 

[exGOPer]

You're too deranged and uninformed for this conversation and, unlike you, posting on the internet is not my life's work so I'll just slap down the last part of your rant.

Yeah let's talk about the children. Between 1970 and 2014, there were almost 44.5 million legal abortions according to the CDC. With well over half a million/year after that. Which means that on the day 17 students lost there lives, there were about 100 X as many abortions. Sorry but I don't listen to gun control lectures from hypocrites who think mass murdering babies is OK.

Ah yes, a religious fanatic who claims to be a 'scientist' who is gonna slap down arguments but never delivers.

Being a scientist, can you show me which branch of science or scientific textbook calls abortion murder and let me know when I had an abortion for me to have murdered anybody.

Ever heard of Ayn Rand?

An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. The living take precedence over the not-yet-living (or the unborn). Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing ...

Try reading that a few times, you Taliban loving medieval farce pretending to be a scientist.

Now go shoot a few children like the Trump supporter you are.

 

[exGOPer]

Interesting meme driven by a Pew poll fabrication... unfortunately it has no place in reality of the political leanings of scientists and engineers -- who by nature are very data, math, statistic and fact driven.

The politics of engineers
http://www.machinedesign.com/news/politics-engineers

Engineers tend to view themselves as much less liberal and slightly more conservative than the general public, according to a recent survey of over 1,200 readers of MACHINE DESIGN and Electronic Design magazines. The same survey also found that engineers say they are more likely to be Republican (42.1%) or Independent (33.7%) voters, as opposed to Democrats (14.5%). And although over a third of the engineers think Republicans represent the best interests of the engineering community better than Democrats, a majority of engineers (48.1%) believe neither party is really on the side of engineers.

Scientists and engineers are NOT synonymous, I know a lot of engineers in my line of work, it's rote learning and there is very little critical thinking that's involved. Scientists unless they are p-hacking have to design their hypothesis and go with the results, it's not vomiting textbooks and learning slowly by experience what you are ordered to do by commercial interests.

 

[gwb-trading]

Scientists and engineers are NOT synonymous, I know a lot of engineers in my line of work, it's rote learning and there is very little critical thinking that's involved. Scientists unless they are p-hacking have to design their hypothesis and go with the results, it's not vomiting textbooks and learning slowly by experience what you are ordered to do by commercial interests.

Go live your fantasy that only 6% of scientists are Republicans based on on the biased Pew survey. Go live your fantasy that engineers do little critical thinking.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Scientists and engineers are NOT synonymous, I know a lot of engineers in my line of work, it's rote learning and there is very little critical thinking that's involved.

Varies but often correct. Civil engineers are not stupid for example but they can get by using simple standard values etc.

There is also a problem with conflating conservative nature with modern Republicanism. The large number of independents I guess shows this off.

Rand was quite the psychopath lady. They differ from males but she died very much alone.

 

[exGOPer]

Go live your fantasy that only 6% of scientists are Republicans based on on the biased Pew survey. Go live your fantasy that engineers do little critical thinking.

LOL, this is what you do in every thread. You tried to confuse scientists with engineers - two completely different professions and fields of study, you never refuted the data and then call it fantasy when your BS is called out.

So those working in the field of cancer research aren't scientists because they are not engineers?

 

[Poindexter]

Ah yes, a religious fanatic who claims to be a 'scientist' who is gonna slap down arguments but never delivers.

Being a scientist, can you show me which branch of science or scientific textbook calls abortion murder and let me know when I had an abortion for me to have murdered anybody.

Ever heard of Ayn Rand?

An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. The living take precedence over the not-yet-living (or the unborn). Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing ...

Try reading that a few times, you Taliban loving medieval farce pretending to be a scientist.

Now go shoot a few children like the Trump supporter you are.

Never delivers? I've slapped you down every time we've "debated" which I put in quotes because I'm not debating you, I'm laughing at and mocking you. And here's another slap down. Murder isn't defined in scientific textbooks, you ignorant blowhard, and it isn't defined by Ayn Rand. It's defined in law. And 38 states currently have fetal homicide laws. http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fetal-homicide-state-laws.aspx